Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Gordon Reportedly Ran A 4.3 Today, DAMN


beastson

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Liberalpanther said:

He's a criminal idc how fast he is he doesn't belong on this team and he has been out of this league for a good while 

Please tell me in what respect he is a "criminal?"

Guy had a DWI in 2014. The only civil conviction on his record. 

Based on my DWI in 1995, I guess I'm to be labeled as a life-long criminal as well, eh?  One can only wish they have as perfect a life as you, without the smallest error in judgment or transgression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cracka McNasty said:

I used to think he was just a dumbass who couldn't stop smoking weed, but it was way more than that. He was a full blown addict and he went to rehab to get clean. I hope he finds peace and stays sober.

I'd swang a late round pick for him. If Cam had him to throw to?

Jeebus, watch out league. 

Could contend immediately with Julio for being the best WR in the division.

If Gordon comes back as good as he was pre-suspension, boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, electro's horse said:

I wisht he Panthers would have traded for him.

Make him live in Thomas Davis' basement. Every time he tried to party TD would beat the poo out of him

Just stating the obvious but it wasn’t going to happen and literally couldn’t before his conditional reinstatement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Please tell me in what respect he is a "criminal?"

Guy had a DWI in 2014. The only civil conviction on his record. 

Based on my DWI in 1995, I guess I'm to be labeled as a life-long criminal as well, eh?  One can only wish they have as perfect a life as you, without the smallest error in judgment or transgression.

Never had a DWI but in retrospect I and a lot of other people I know could have.  I don't excuse him for his past mistakes, hell, I thin he's a knucklehead but everything isn't always that cut and dry.  You don't have to be physically addicted to have a problem.  To put all the money and fame on the line to get high or drunk makes you have extremely poor judgement or have an extremely bad problem. It's easy to pass judgement on someone and kick them when their down.  

Hope he makes a comeback and keeps his demons at bay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Please tell me in what respect he is a "criminal?"

Guy had a DWI in 2014. The only civil conviction on his record. 

Based on my DWI in 1995, I guess I'm to be labeled as a life-long criminal as well, eh?  One can only wish they have as perfect a life as you, without the smallest error in judgment or transgression.

DWI is a crime. Hence people convicted of them are criminals. 

Yes, those who have been convicted of a crime are criminals 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, csx said:

DWI is a crime. Hence people convicted of them are criminals. 

Yes, those who have been convicted of a crime are criminals 

A criminal is someone who has committed a crime. If you've ever downloaded music illegally, gone over the speed limit, eaten grapes in the grocery store(this is stealing), jaywalked, or literally any of the other dozens of things we all do that are against the law then by definition you are a criminal. We are all criminals. Being convicted of a crime makes you a convict. 

Not that the definition really matters. The dude smoked some weed and had a bit too much to drink. He was convicted and paid his debt to society. If he doesn't have any other legal obligations then why get butthurt about him possibly returning to work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...