Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Byrd's role?


Bronn

Recommended Posts

What are everyone's thoughts on Damiere's role moving forward?

Does he immediately step in as #2 or #3 opposite Funchess or Funchess/Shep? I have to say I've been really unimpressed with Shepard. He's a JAG out there if not worse IMHO.

Is he WR #4 for now and will only feature in 4 wide sets?

Do we activate Bersin this week and roll with 6WR or does he get deactivated?

I'm looking for a sneaky pickup for my bench at WR in fantasy football, and had the thought that maybe Byrd comes back with a vengeance these last few games...

Obviously he and Clay share a similar skill set, but I think Byrd has better hands and routes.

I've never really been on the Byrd bandwagon, but I see a situation where a guy like him could come in and make some noise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He can't do any worse than zero catches for zero yards which was last week's stat line for every WR we have not named Devin Funchess.

Yeah, its kind of a crap shoot.  We have several guys with speed, but speed is meaningless if you can't get open and catch the ball. Might as well throw him in the mix.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

Byrd = Samuel

At this moment they should be about equal Samuel has the juice he just needs to get some nfl training in. Bryd beefed up already hope he can contribute this week.

39 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He can't do any worse than zero catches for zero yards which was last week's stat line for every WR we have not named Devin Funchess.

This is ignorant straight up.

33 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Samuel had more catches in one game than Byrd has his entire career.  I hope he shows something when he comes back, but so far, he hasn't. 

He hadn't but you have to take into account Cam with Byrd actually playing has had KB and Olsen & Fun last year and this year KB and Fun ahead of him getting most of the targets along with CMC this year there while he was active there really hasn't been a place for him in a Shula offense. Now that the lines been gelling and we actually need his production now would be the great judgement of what he has to offer. He's gained the weight last few years been in the system and has speed now we'll see if he has football moxy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

Going to be featured in end arounds

I think Clay might have better wheels than Byrd for those 

you ride guys that have shown as well.  Clay got some confidence going.  That means something in this sport 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...