Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lattimore didn't practice today


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Dex said:

We have one receiver worth a damn. If Lattimore plays we may be fuged.

i'm pretty sure the league thought the same thing in 2015 when KB went down. 

Didn't respect our offense one bit, and we all know how that turned out. Cam putting his ball sack on the rest of the NFL en route to 15-1 and a superbowl. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nails said:

All the king’s horses and all the king’s men having trouble putting Glass-hon back together again it sounds like.  In other news water is wet.  Only news when this guy DOES play.  What a joke.

Entered this thread to mention you.

saw you’d already commented 

was not disappoint 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

i'm pretty sure the league thought the same thing in 2015 when KB went down. 

Didn't respect our offense one bit, and we all know how that turned out. Cam putting his ball sack on the rest of the NFL en route to 15-1 and a superbowl. 

 

Except we have no Ted Ginn and not one of the other WRs have proven themselves yet through 3/4ths of the season. If you count McCaffrey then we have two good WRs with him and Funchess, but I think McCaffrey is often times not even targeted when hes open . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

Well Olsen didn't show up either. It would be absolutely huge if Lattimore was out and both Olsen and Funchess are in, we'd have a clear atvantage somewhere in the passing game. Really hoping Greg somehow gets cleared to play, need all of our weapons to win. 

I hear what you’re saying and I know you didn’t mean to compare the two, but just wanted to add there’s obviously zero comparison between a guy like Greg that’s tough as nails with a career of dependability, even quoted as saying “the best ability is availability”, and the complete opposite of that.  

My gut says VERY little on heaven or earth would keep Greg out Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...