Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL tinkering with the outcomes of a game?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Maybe not so obvious, but there are ways to influence a game outcome in various ways. The refs can make or break any game with one or two suspect calls at the right time, injuries that may or may not be valid, bogus plays on the field, etc. With viewership being down and interest starting to drop, they need to keep the biggest teams in the spotlight.

Very hard to prove, but I feel that something is going on

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course they do, especially since Goodell.     Too many "story lines" that create ratings have happened.     It's perfectly LEGAL since the NFL is the same type of company as the WWE, "entertainment".    I don't think it always works, and I don't think tons of people are involved, but ONE ref can edge games one direction etc.    The league is almost completely profit sharing so ratings gets everyone involved money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Maybe not so obvious, but there are ways to influence a game outcome in various ways. The refs can make or break any game with one or two suspect calls at the right time, injuries that may or may not be valid, bogus plays on the field, etc. With viewership being down and interest starting to drop, they need to keep the biggest teams in the spotlight.

Very hard to prove, but I feel that something is going on

 

I totally agree. I thought it was pretty obvious with that guy from the saints head going down and not even getting near Diggs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

I totally agree. I thought it was pretty obvious with that guy from the saints head going down and not even getting near Diggs.

So you're saying the NFL somehow got Williams to throw the game? There's no way to know how that game is going to end, which player would be in the key position to change the outcome. You'd have to make sure almost every Saints defender knew what to do. You are implying a much larger conspiracy that would require an unsustainable amount of people to have knowledge of and keep quiet about. You're also ignoring that the NFL would have wanted the Saints to win over the Vikings because Brees is a better draw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Maybe not so obvious, but there are ways to influence a game outcome in various ways. The refs can make or break any game with one or two suspect calls at the right time, injuries that may or may not be valid, bogus plays on the field, etc. With viewership being down and interest starting to drop, they need to keep the biggest teams in the spotlight.

Very hard to prove, but I feel that something is going on

I have a hard time believing the NFL could keep it quiet, especially in this day and age where everyone has a camera in their back pocket and breaking a story like this would be a career maker. 

5 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Do you think the nfl wanted the jaguars in the Superbowl?? Look at the number of penalties called on the patriots vs the jags...

The Panthers were one of the least penalized teams this season. Was the NFL trying to get us into the playoffs?

So did the NFL tell the Jags to burn the whole play clock and not call time out to negate a key 3rd down pick up late in the 1st half that would have prevented the final Patriots drive of the half with the suspect PI and critical TD? Did the NFL tell the Jags to switch to more zone based coverage in the second half rather than the man they had played the whole game?

The crew didn't call many penalties at all. The only hold they called was worthy of a MMA take-down. Good coaches read the officials just like the weather or wind and instruct their team accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Do you think the nfl wanted the jaguars in the Superbowl?? Look at the number of penalties called on the patriots vs the jags...

I don't think the NFL told Doug Marrone to cut his own balls off and completely shut it down from :55 in the 2nd onwards.

People think Rivera is conservative... that right there was some playing not to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% confident the NFL does not tinker with the outcome. Bad calls happen all year to all teams. We notice is with certain teams more often because ESPN talks about 4-5 teams regularly, if that. If the NFL wanted the highest markets to do well then Brady and Zeek would never have received 4 game suspensions. Or, during the appeal they would have been reduced to 2 games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doubling tripling and quadrupling down on this subject in defense of the pick is reminiscent of a certain mindset that has overtaken the political world. This conversation will become less contentious and dragged out to the point of becoming a dead beaten horse if rational minds can simply agree that we made a mistake missed on a potential franchise center and we will learn from it. All this coping is unnecessary.
    • Here in lies the rub that the supporting posters continue to ignore. He wasn’t a 2nd round pick in the 2025 class, especially with an ACL tear. It was a dumb pick for any GM who looks ahead to determine values. C and CB were much better values than an injured RB in 2024. If a RB isn’t even playing much in 2024, you have to compare him to 2025. We’re beating a dead horse but only because the defense of the pick is almost comical at this point. We’ve made a ton of poo picks and moves/non trades while Morgan was GM and the assistant GM. It happens, we don’t have to jump through hoops to act like we just had some really bad luck. The 2025 draft class is unknown so far but damn it felt way better afterwards for the first time in a long time. Embrace the potential and stop stamping guaranteed on the box of poo of the 2018-2024 drafts. We are were we aware because of them and 2025 has to hit so we can get past the 7 win max in 7 year hurdle. Also, “flashed his talent” isn’t 9 carries for 22 yards. His one reception for 18 yards isn’t a flash with 11 other touches for 27 yards. He hasn’t proven anything. We have no idea if he’ll contribute in 2026.
    • Oh for those tired of the Mannings I have bad news, Peytons son Marshal already has college teams after him and he isn't even in HS until this fall...   I'd wager we have two Mannings in the NFL in 2030
×
×
  • Create New...