Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

King: Panthers an option to play Eagles opening weekend


trueblade

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Pretty sure they were in the visitors locker room as AFC was the “home” team this year. Interestingly though the league was going to make an exception if the Vikings made it and they’d be able to use their regular facilities at the stadium.

Most stadiums have more than two locker rooms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, RLT89 said:

cowboys always open up vs the giants.

While I'll agree it's been a trend, three in a row is hardly "always."

2017 - NYG

2016 - NYG

2015 - NYG

2014 - 49ers

2013 - NYG

2012 - NYG

2011 - Jets

2010 - Redskins

2009 - Bucs

2008 - Browns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

What? So there is no possibility thats a divisional game? I dont get that 

of course this is a possibility. this is just based on their schedule of home games and playoff teams. we make no sense for an opening season story line. only the Vikes or division game makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t see them wasting the cowboys game that early. That game isn’t guaranteed big ratings. They will save that one to go up against the World Series in October. 

 

My guess is either Giants. New head coach, big market, and likely getting Odell back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The right answer is neither and drafting Maye with the #1 Pick of the 2024 Draft lmfao we traded away the #1 in a QB LOADED DRAFT
    • I have no idea why you are so irrationally upset about the notion that going out and spending $150 million free agency dollars on two interior offensive linemen could be construed as a panic response after our #1 pick we traded a fortune for had one of the worst rookie seasons of the last 25 years. It is objectively what transpired. Dan Morgan as of right now is a mixed bag. Some really good some so so some not so good some bad some really bad. You take any rational criticism personally like you are related to him or something. That's something you'll have to figure out for yourself. Anyways. The predicament Dan Morgan finds himself in for this year will define his future as GM. I sincerely hope he navigates it to perfection. But the circumstances are largely of his own creation. And not just in his stint as GM but going back to his time as assistant GM. Which conveniently people like yourself don't like to talk about. That is the reality of the situation. I like how you will carry water for Dan Morgan to the point of getting into random spats with people but make no mention of Bryce Young's glaring limitations and shortcomings as a starting QB yet go out of your way to put the onus of our struggles squarely on Canales. I mean I've been quite critical of Canales too but he sure isn't the only one to blame for our problems.
    • They weren't well thought out. We needed one, not both. 2 top center/guard candidates were going to be available in the 2nd. We would have been fine with JPJ or Frazier. Drafting either over XL or Brooks would have made perfect sense. Hell, drafting both would have made sense even if we had signed Lewis or Hunt. Instead we drafted a 1 year wonder project WR and a luxury RB that we didn't need since we had Hubbard. Draft IOL, pay tackles. Plenty of 2nd round guards and centers start immediately and play very well. Those 2 picks were not good then, now, no matter how much explaining anyone tries to do. Several of called it then. 
×
×
  • Create New...