Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ted Ginn 2.0


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Just an observation, but I hear us talking about getting a deep threat WR, like we had in Ted Ginn.  We drafted a player like Ginn. 

We have Ted Ginn 2.0, don't we?  Curtis Samuel.  I don't think he was being used the same way, when he was healthy.  I realize some of you are going to refer to his injuries, etc., but one season does not mean squat.

  • College:  Both-Ohio State
  • Combine 40 time:  Ginn 4.28; Samuel 4.31
  • Height:  Both 5' 11"
  • Weight:  Ginn 180; Samuel 195
  • Strengths:  Athleticism, speed
  • Weaknesses:  Route running, hands
  • Draft: Ginn 1st round; Samuel 2nd round

The difference?  At Ohio State, Samuel was listed as a running back because "Swiss army knife"  is not a position.  So Samuel, despite the injuries, had a challenging transition from college to NFL.  He is also a bit raw, needing time to develop his hands and route running...Ginn has struggled with those 2 things his entire career.  Ginn was never more than a #4 WR before coming to Charlotte, so give Samuel some time. 

Having said that, we need 2 WRs that can get deep, not one--that keeps the safeties honest or requires a CB to run with 4.3 speed. So I think Samuel in the slot, Funchess as the #2 WR, and a stallion as the #1 WR is the design.  

Damiere Byrd: Yes, I know we think he is fragile, and he might be, but as for his speed, Byrd ran a 4.27 at his pro day.  He has pretty good hands and has been developing his skills as a WR.

So, my question is (and it is a sincere question): Can these 2 WRs become deep threats?  If so, do we need another speed WR?  Is the need to simply continue developing Samuel and Byrd?  

I am interested to learn what the response here is because it has a lot to do with my mock drafting, so it is urgent.

(Full disclosure:  I am of the mindset that we need another stud TE and the WR we draft should be a player with solid hands, excellent route running skills, and the ability to get separation out of cuts.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get the feeling that anyone here (or at BoA) "has it out" for Byrd or Samuel.  In fact, I think most folks believe that, barring injury, they could both become actual NFL receivers.  Everyone likes their measurables.

The concern here, I believe, is that they are not proven quantities, and we continue to put most or all of our chips on "potential" instead of finding a handful of proven players to take us to the next level.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love both Byrd and Samuel.  I think the potential is there.  But healthy competition is good.  Someone has to push these guys to success. For Byrd, was it just really bad luck?  Or is he fragile?  For Samuel, he has to re-learn to do a lot of things and he missed a ton of time with his hamstrings.  

Hopefully both pan out, but I'm not going to count on their production until it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Just an observation, but I hear us talking about getting a deep threat WR, like we had in Ted Ginn.  We drafted a player like Ginn. 

We have Ted Ginn 2.0, don't we?  Curtis Samuel.  I don't think he was being used the same way, when he was healthy.  I realize some of you are going to refer to his injuries, etc., but one season does not mean squat.

  • College:  Both-Ohio State
  • Combine 40 time:  Ginn 4.28; Samuel 4.31
  • Height:  Both 5' 11"
  • Weight:  Ginn 180; Samuel 195
  • Strengths:  Athleticism, speed
  • Weaknesses:  Route running, hands
  • Draft: Ginn 1st round; Samuel 2nd round

The difference?  At Ohio State, Samuel was listed as a running back because "Swiss army knife"  is not a position.  So Samuel, despite the injuries, had a challenging transition from college to NFL.  He is also a bit raw, needing time to develop his hands and route running...Ginn has struggled with those 2 things his entire career.  Ginn was never more than a #4 WR before coming to Charlotte, so give Samuel some time. 

Having said that, we need 2 WRs that can get deep, not one--that keeps the safeties honest or requires a CB to run with 4.3 speed. So I think Samuel in the slot, Funchess as the #2 WR, and a stallion as the #1 WR is the design.  

Damiere Byrd: Yes, I know we think he is fragile, and he might be, but as for his speed, Byrd ran a 4.27 at his pro day.  He has pretty good hands and has been developing his skills as a WR.

So, my question is (and it is a sincere question): Can these 2 WRs become deep threats?  If so, do we need another speed WR?  Is the need to simply continue developing Samuel and Byrd?  

I am interested to learn what the response here is because it has a lot to do with my mock drafting, so it is urgent.

(Full disclosure:  I am of the mindset that we need another stud TE and the WR we draft should be a player with solid hands, excellent route running skills, and the ability to get separation out of cuts.)

 

Byrd & Samuel are perfect pair for this offense to compliment Greg,Funchess & power running game. I believe Samuel takes a huge step this coming season having a full off-season to get his body molded for the pro game, hell look at how much Byrd bulked up after cpl of seasons.

 

2nd TE who can block and catch will do wonders for this offense with ability to go to run or pass at any given situation.

Draft:

TE

RB

FS

C

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Just an observation, but I hear us talking about getting a deep threat WR, like we had in Ted Ginn.  We drafted a player like Ginn. 

We have Ted Ginn 2.0, don't we?  Curtis Samuel.  I don't think he was being used the same way, when he was healthy.  I realize some of you are going to refer to his injuries, etc., but one season does not mean squat.

  • College:  Both-Ohio State
  • Combine 40 time:  Ginn 4.28; Samuel 4.31
  • Height:  Both 5' 11"
  • Weight:  Ginn 180; Samuel 195
  • Strengths:  Athleticism, speed
  • Weaknesses:  Route running, hands
  • Draft: Ginn 1st round; Samuel 2nd round

The difference?  At Ohio State, Samuel was listed as a running back because "Swiss army knife"  is not a position.  So Samuel, despite the injuries, had a challenging transition from college to NFL.  He is also a bit raw, needing time to develop his hands and route running...Ginn has struggled with those 2 things his entire career.  Ginn was never more than a #4 WR before coming to Charlotte, so give Samuel some time. 

Having said that, we need 2 WRs that can get deep, not one--that keeps the safeties honest or requires a CB to run with 4.3 speed. So I think Samuel in the slot, Funchess as the #2 WR, and a stallion as the #1 WR is the design.  

Damiere Byrd: Yes, I know we think he is fragile, and he might be, but as for his speed, Byrd ran a 4.27 at his pro day.  He has pretty good hands and has been developing his skills as a WR.

So, my question is (and it is a sincere question): Can these 2 WRs become deep threats?  If so, do we need another speed WR?  Is the need to simply continue developing Samuel and Byrd?  

I am interested to learn what the response here is because it has a lot to do with my mock drafting, so it is urgent.

(Full disclosure:  I am of the mindset that we need another stud TE and the WR we draft should be a player with solid hands, excellent route running skills, and the ability to get separation out of cuts.)

We need a playmaker TE and another possion receiver. Unless a STUD receiver falls to us like Julio. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Byrd and Samuel have enough to pencil in as 3rd and 4th WRs.  Byrd, for what ever reason, seems slower than I'd expect on the field. Samuel seems a bit shiftier than Teddy to me - which makes sense; he was a running back at times. If there is any belief that these guys can provide consistant deep speed, then that has to make a signing like Mike Wallace, or Torrey Smith after he gets cut, a little less likely.

I agree that Funchess is no more than a #2. - probably a pretty good one. I REALLY want a real, professional, legit, #1 WR like Allen Robinson. Having seen the same offseasons play out that you guys have, I REALLY don't think that will happen via free agency. I'd be content with another #2 WR via free agency - Lee, Hurns, Jordan Matthews etc. Let Shepard walk. Let Bersin Walk. Spend one of the top few picks at Wideout.  Spend another top pick at TE - I'd be extremely happy with  Fumagalli, Schultz, or Goedert out of South Dakota St. I know it won't happen because of needs elsewhere but I could think of worse things than to spend two of our top 4 picks at TE and get Schultz and Goedert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue with most of you guys on this forum is if someone gets hurt or doesn't have that Madden numbers their rookie year you are ready to write them off and move on.  

Everyone is so ready to grab a player in the draft when we have the talent already.  IMO we waste a draft pick because so many of you are ready to jettison a good player.

We need to focus on drafting positions of REAL need.  Safety, DE, LT just to name a few.

I agree with signing a vet to improve our WR Corps but I am not one to want to waste a pick on a first round WR when we have players that are as good or even better than the talent you want to add. 

Let's focus on drafting players that can fill a real void instead of drafting another player of the same or similiar caliber just because our former rookie got hurt last year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Window is closing. We need proven playmakers to step in. Not waiting around for another receiver to develop. That has been a very long process over the course of 15 years. Funchess finally has gotten to a point, but he's no number 1. We waited around for KB just to trade him. Samuel and Byrd can still develop, but there's no way in fuging hell that we enter next season with these three guys and russell shepherd as our receiving core. And no, not paying minimum for someone like Tyrell Williams is going to work either. We need to match our pro bowl - hall of fame qb with the same type of receiver. It'll just make everyone better around him too. We also can't just sit around and think Olsen is dependable after this past year. If we wanna win now, we gotta open the check book. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Thorrez said:

40 time is one thing, top speed another and I have yet to see either of Samuel or Byrd show a top speed even close to Ginn. 

I think both Samuel and Byrd have that ability to stretch the field.   It is far too early to make a statement like this considering both got hurt just as they were starting to fit in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...