Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mock Draft Charley Casserly

DaveThePanther2008

By DaveThePanther2008,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted

christian kirk is maybe a lower second round talent at best based off college. Projection, yes he has potential. But I'd rather take a whole ton of players over Kirk any day who are more proven, have even more potential, and likely will make a day one impact.

Calvin Ridley's the only first rounder I want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Based on this mock. These two guys were taken after Kirk. 

I would rather take Guise or Harold Landry who has been referred to as the second coming of Vonn Miller.

Landry is more of a 3-4 pass rusher and I think he should probably go in the 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted

I understand why people mock him to us, he definitely shows the speed and explosiveness that our offense seems to lack.

I'm just worried his best position might be slot.  I’m also worried the same could be said about Samuel, Bryd, and maybe even CMC.  I’m still hoping we sign a quality outside receiver in free agency.  If that happens I think we can cover slot with the guys we have.

He might be better then those guys but you have to look at the team as a whole.

Are we better off with Kirk in the slot and the safeties we already have or draft a safety and have Samuel/Bryd/CMC in the slot?  And not just safety, same argument could be made for multiple positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Khyber53
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • MHS831
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • MHS831
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...