Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Power Ranking 2018...(Way to early)


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

Power Rankings out of CBS Sports.

I don't see how they can put Seattle ahead of us and questionable with Houston.   

The Seahawks have some serious questions about their defense.  It isn't what it used to be.

Houston you have an argument but for every argument that Watson will return to the form he had as a Rookie, you could make the same argument that Turner will make a 11-5 team better.

IMO we should have been in the top 10.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-power-rankings-super-bowl-champion-eagles-begin-2018-offseason-on-top/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Power Rankings out of CBS Sports.

I don't see how they can put Seattle ahead of us and questionable with Houston.   

The Seahawks have some serious questions about their defense.  It isn't what it used to be.

Houston you have an argument but for every argument that Watson will return to the form he had as a Rookie, you could make the same argument that Turner will make a 11-5 team better.

IMO we should have been in the top 10.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-power-rankings-super-bowl-champion-eagles-begin-2018-offseason-on-top/

Turner makes everything better...his hire was truly a game changer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Power Rankings out of CBS Sports.

I don't see how they can put Seattle ahead of us and questionable with Houston.   

The Seahawks have some serious questions about their defense.  It isn't what it used to be.

Houston you have an argument but for every argument that Watson will return to the form he had as a Rookie, you could make the same argument that Turner will make a 11-5 team better.

IMO we should have been in the top 10.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-power-rankings-super-bowl-champion-eagles-begin-2018-offseason-on-top/

We have the element of surprise, for the first time since 2011. Cam has been running the same scheme since he entered the league, even with the talk of evolving the offense. Turner should inject some diversity that has been what the offense, and Cam specifically, has been sorely missing. 

If the offense is put together during the offense, we should come out of the gates with some impressive performances, at least for the first half of the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...