Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tag and Trade Norwell -


Panthro

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Skack25 said:

Because in Charlotte, contrary to what Ron may say, we are very much in the business of developing players for other teams.

So is every other team in the NFL. It's not like we're the only team who has this problem. That's life in the salary cap era of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Panthro said:

Why on earth do we not tag and trade him for a 2nd Round Pick? He's young and good enough to warrant the pick. 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSgbJuhBjTDQ1lgZz4Txev

This like dangling a carrot in front of Ol' Nippleshorts.

 

Which would allow for us to draft.

1 Ronnie Harrison

2 Nick Chubb

2 Hayden Hurst

3 Frank Ragnow 

3 Jesse Bates III 

 

I say do it :100_Emoji_42x42:

 

We would solidify our Oline in place of another that could replace Ryan next year.

Our Safeties would be set for years.

Nick Chubb + CMC = Book of Revelations for the NFL

Hayden Hurst the most pro ready TE that has mad skills.

 

giphy-31.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is going to pay $14m and give up a day 2 draft pick for a G?

Not happening.  For the same reason we are not tagging him, others will not pay it either.

How much intel did Gettlemen release when he was here?  Not much. Suddenly, we learn that he is interested in paying Norwell a ton of cash?   I think he is messing with us, getting us to tag him.  We will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Who is going to pay $14m and give up a day 2 draft pick for a G?

Not happening.  For the same reason we are not tagging him, others will not pay it either.

How much intel did Gettlemen release when he was here?  Not much. Suddenly, we learn that he is interested in paying Norwell a ton of cash?   I think he is messing with us, getting us to tag him.  We will see.

But!

Norwell has a proven track record. The Gs in the draft could be bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because if you tag him, he'll probably sign it immediately . . . and then you're trying to trade a guard who has a franchise LT contract.  He might be the best guard in the NFL, but no one is going to pay him LT money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...