Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our new TE of the Future?


Fox007

Recommended Posts

Mike Gesicki shot up the boards with his combine performance and since we missed out on Hunter Henry we may as well get an even better TE?

https://247sports.com/college/penn-state/Bolt/Greg-Olsen-impressed-with-Penn-State-TE-Mike-Gesicki-115894189

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2018/profiles/mike-gesicki?id=2559889 - Performance and Measurables

Not a blocker but Olsen doesn't exactly road grade and we've been just fine with a pass catching TE. He'll be going in the first and we have a later pick so would you pull the trigger or try to trade down? what says everyone but Sanjay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, Olsen was being asked live what he thought about this guy and he was "impressed" with his measurables  He goes on to say the following:

Quote

"If he goes to the right system, not a true two-back, downhill power gap run team," Olsen said. "Listen, he's going to have to put his hand on the ground at some point next to a tackle and at least hold his own in there, but for the most part if he's in the right system with a guy who can move him around and get him in space, that size and athleticism and ability to track the ball, there's just not a lot of those guys out there like that."

Unless we are all of the sudden not going to value blocking TEs, I do not see this guy at the top of our board at 24. However, if we truly are shifting away from that mindset (which I don't think we are), then this guy could be a stud for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, stbugs said:

He had a rough year was supposed to be . He’s got measureables but Hurst and Andrews will be better TEs. This is a case where watching the drills shows you which guys are better at TE position and those two also had pretty good numbers. I thought there were even a few others that looked good who might be later rounds. The Dissly kid from WU was impressive catching and he was also a hands down TE at WU so likely a good blocker. 

Hurst will be a 25 y/o rookie and the reports on Andrews blocking is even worse than Gesicki and any of these guys with OUs QB(Heisman winner) would post better #s than they did.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2018/profiles/mark-andrews?id=2560119

"Gives poor effort as a blocker. Lacks aggression. Doesn't look for work enough. Hand usage and angles to his work as a blocker are poor. Big but unreliable in running game.

DRAFT PROJECTION

 Rounds 3-4

SOURCES TELL US

 "He's a great big slot receiver. That's it. He won't block at all so what do you have other than a big slot who is an average athlete? I gave him a Day 3 grade." -- AFC regional scout"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gisecki is a workout warrior. I wouldn't want him before the 5th to be honest. Watch him play and nothing jumps out. Hell, just watch his field drills during the combine. He tested out as the best athlete by far, but he looked like a JAG in the on field drills. Guys like Mark Andrews and Hayden Hurst looked so much smoother and faster while running actual football drills vs. track events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

 "He's a great big slot receiver. That's it. He won't block at all so what do you have other than a big slot who is an average athlete? I gave him a Day 3 grade." -- AFC regional scout"

 

You can copy and paste this comment for virtually every top TE coming out of college for most of the last decade. That's the reality of the TE position these days in most of these spread oriented college offenses. Very few college TEs are spending significant time with their hand in the dirt on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You can copy and paste this comment for virtually every top TE coming out of college for most of the last decade. That's the reality of the TE position these days in most of these spread oriented college offenses. Very few college TEs are spending significant time with their hand in the dirt on the line.

Yup hence that's why I did. So it's more about who can create the best mismatches in the passing game for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Yup hence that's why I did. So it's more about who can create the best mismatches in the passing game for us.

Andrews 100%. Listening to Olsen's commentary he was practically begging for the Panthers to take a young TE. He really likes working with the young guys and I think he knows he's in the twilight of his career. I think he wants to work with his successor to continue the legacy. I'd take Mark Andrews in the 2nd with no hesitation. I like Hurst, but I don't like that he's 25. He'll be 29 (30 if someone takes him in the 1st and exercises the 5th year option) when he's signing his second contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would LOVE  to go back to the Chud - 2 pass catching TE system. We absolutely ruined teams thru the air that year, and Shocked/Olsen patrolling the seams was a huge reason why. 

Can we expect more of that with Norv? Isn't chud Turner disciple?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Don’t know much about blocking, but they absolutely looked better as TE/receivers. Not saying I’d take any at 1.24, but as TEs they looked better in the drills. 

Yea I see what you and Gorge are saying when I put those on. I didn't think any TE was going in the 1st this year until this came up and they always climb with the workout performers so I put the question out there.

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Andrews 100%. Listening to Olsen's commentary he was practically begging for the Panthers to take a young TE. He really likes working with the young guys and I think he knows he's in the twilight of his career. I think he wants to work with his successor to continue the legacy. I'd take Mark Andrews in the 2nd with no hesitation. I like Hurst, but I don't like that he's 25. He'll be 29 (30 if someone takes him in the 1st and exercises the 5th year option) when he's signing his second contract.

Yea we need a young TE and like I said up above I didn't think any were 1st rounders and make the thread about the new "buzz" workout guy. Didn't pay much attention to him during the year as the other top 3 guys including Goedert got more attention. I hope we get one in the 2nd or 3rd at least....still would rather have Hunter Henry over Butler but now that Star is leaving maybe we'll get some play there.

 

But I still think Mike is going in the 1st on potential. I also think Andrews is getting some overhype based on the Heisman QB he had.

The concept that NFL teams will be going off of is that they think they can teach Mike what the other TEs know and can do already but you can't teach his measurables to the other guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...