Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Move from 24 to 15


trueblade

Recommended Posts

The NFL Network did their Live Mock Draft. The particiapants were  Daniel Jeremiah (@movethesticks), Charles Davis (@cfd22). Dave Dameshek, Christa Frelund, Colleen Wolfe, Bucky Brooks (former Panthers scout), Steve Mariucci, and Maurice Jones Drew. 

In their mock, Minkah Fitzpatrick lasted until Pick 15. What would it cost the Panthers to move up from 24 to 15 get Fitzpatrick if this scenario played out on Draft night?

Here's the mock in case you missed it.

#1 Browns USC QB Sam Darnold (Jeremiah)
#2 NYG Penn State RB Saquon Barkley (Maricucci)
#3 NYJ Oklahoma QB Baker Mayfield (Davis)
#4 Browns NC State DE Bradley Chubb (Jeremiah)
#5 DEN UCLA QB Josh Rosen (Jones Drew)
#6 Colts Georgia LB Roquan Smith (Brooks)
#7 TB Florida State S Derwin James (Wolfe) - not a fan of TB getting James, ugh.
#8 CHI Notre Dame G Quenton Nelson (Frelund)
#9 49ers Virginia Tech LB Tremaine Edmunds (Mariucci)
#10 OAK Ohio State CB Denzel Ward (MJD)
#11 MAI Washington DT Vita Vea (Dameshek)
#12 Bills Wyoming QB Josh Allen (Brooks)
#13 Redskins UTEP G Will Hernandez (Frelund)
#14 GB UTSA DE Marcus Davenport.(Brooks)
#15 AZ Alabama S Minkah Fitzpatrick (Wolfe)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tarheelpride said:

Maybe I’m naive, but I think a 3rd can do it. If we trade up, i think it’ll be for DJ Moore. We’d have to jump Dallas to get him. 

 

That’s the only scenario I can see us trading up

That would be a steal according to the draft value chart. Teams don't like giving away steals. #24 plus one of our 3rds gets us up in the #18 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That would be a steal according to the draft value chart. Teams don't like giving away steals. #24 plus one of our 3rds gets us up in the #18 range.

Yea 18 is the highest I can see us moving up. Perfect territory to go After Ridley or Moore. Cowboys picking at 19 and Patriots at 22. Both teams need a receiver and both are the only 2 teams reported to have brought them both in on a visit in addition to us.

 If we were to trade up those seem like the most likely targets and 1 of the 3rd's seems like the max compensation we'd consider parting with. I'd make the move for Ridley but I'd hold off on doing it for Moore.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, panther4life said:

Yea 18 is the highest I can see us moving up. Perfect territory to go After Ridley or Moore. Cowboys picking at 19 and Patriots at 22. Both teams need a receiver and both are the only 2 teams reported to have brought them both in on a visit in addition to us.

 If we were to trade up those seem like the most likely targets and 1 of the 3rd's seems like the max compensation we'd consider parting with. I'd make the move for Ridley but I'd hold off on doing it for Moore.

 

Yep. That would make sense and a move like that wouldn't shock me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...