Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 6 WRs


Recommended Posts

After looking at the Roster I can see us keeping 6 WR with Byrd as our PR/WR.

Funchess, Moore, Samuel, Smith, Wright being the primary WRs. 

If we only keep 5 do we cut Wright or Byrd.  I think the other 4 are fairly safe.

Do any of the others really have a legitimate shot of replacing Wright or Bryd or are they just camp fodder?

What a difference over a year ago.  I really like those six players and gives Turner the opportunity to do some really interesting things.

Thoughts

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think half the board is high on Byrd the other half wasn’t as impressed with him due to the small sample size. I think Damiere  just needs to stay healthy. If he has prepared for a rigorous season the way he should by possibly putting on a few pound of muscle/mass I am definitely on the we need to keep him train. He was to valuable in the games he played to cut him or let him walk. We saw the importance of needing depth last year. Since Samuel and Byrd are slight in frame I think keeping 6 guys is important but at the same time that’s why we have OTAs and training camp. All 6 should be able to show if they belong in Norvs offense. 

 

I just hope Rivera stays out of Norvs way. He needs to spend his time in the secondary meeting rooms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Beast_3000 said:

I think half the board is high on Byrd the other half wasn’t as impressed with him due to the small sample size. I think Damiere  just needs to stay healthy. If he has prepared for a rigorous season the way he should by possibly putting on a few pound of muscle/mass I am definitely on the we need to keep him train. He was to valuable in the games he played to cut him or let him walk. We saw the importance of needing depth last year. Since Samuel and Byrd are slight in frame I think keeping 6 guys is important but at the same time that’s why we have OTAs and training camp. All 6 should be able to show if they belong in Norvs offense. 

 

5'11" and 200lbs isn't exactly slight of frame. If that's the case, a lot of guys are including OBJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside the Philly Brown punt return for a touchdown and that was more of a gaff than a great return.

When was the last time we scored a TD off a punt return?  Byrd return last year was outstanding and we are crazy not to keep him as a PR.   that is why I feel Wright is the odd man out if we stick with only 5 WRs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, top dawg said:

5'11" and 200lbs isn't exactly slight of frame. If that's the case, a lot of guys are including OBJ.

The slight of frame comment was directed more so to Damiere Byrd. He is 5’9” and probably 185. I’m assuming you are referencing to Samuel who last season had just as many injury concerns as Byrd. My point was for the team to be successful those guys have to stay healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Byrd is practice squad material. He's the reason we went out and got receivers because we don't need clay and byrd playing receiver. Rivera only ever keeps 5 WR. Byrd will have his chance if someone gets hurt, which i'm still banking on Samuel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ARSEN said:

Not way Wright is getting cut.  He’s above average slot WR.

We also paid him $2 million up front and he's the most familiar with Norv's offense. I think he is on the team, even if we have to cut Byrd. I think we keep six though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Outside the Philly Brown punt return for a touchdown and that was more of a gaff than a great return.

When was the last time we scored a TD off a punt return?  Byrd return last year was outstanding and we are crazy not to keep him as a PR.   that is why I feel Wright is the odd man out if we stick with only 5 WRs.

FYI Byrd has the KO return. Clay had the punt return. Your point about any return TDs stands though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Byrd is practice squad material. He's the reason we went out and got receivers because we don't need clay and byrd playing receiver. Rivera only ever keeps 5 WR. Byrd will have his chance if someone gets hurt, which i'm still banking on Samuel. 

Byrd has no more PS eligibility.  A lot of people don't realize this is his fourth season coming up here.  I suppose we could stash him on IR with some made up injury if we wanted, but even that wouldn't make sense since his contract is up after the season.  This needs to be the season he comes good or gets cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beast_3000 said:

The slight of frame comment was directed more so to Damiere Byrd. He is 5’9” and probably 185. I’m assuming you are referencing to Samuel who last season had just as many injury concerns as Byrd. My point was for the team to be successful those guys have to stay healthy. 

Steve Smith was 5'9 185.... Byrd shares a similar build... yet smitty was himself injury prone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beast_3000 said:

The slight of frame comment was directed more so to Damiere Byrd. He is 5’9” and probably 185. I’m assuming you are referencing to Samuel who last season had just as many injury concerns as Byrd. My point was for the team to be successful those guys have to stay healthy. 

I get what you're saying, but Samuel doesn't really have the same injury concerns as Byrd in my opinion. Samuel's only real injury was bad luck. He got his ankle rolled up. As for the hamstring, that was just the team playing it safe (much like the Giants did with OBJ his rookie year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...