Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you weren't a Panthers fan....


kungfoodude

Recommended Posts

If not for the Panthers, I would still be a Packers fan. I am just old enough to remember the end of the Lombardi era. I suffered through the next couple down decades and about the time they were good again, we got the Panthers and I switched to the home team...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My father was from Baltimore and back my grandfather took us to a Colts training camp.   After the practice they had Maryland's famous steamed Crabs which my grandfather had something to with it.   We met some of the Colts.  He also got us one of the old white footballs signed by the Colts.  Unitas, Berry, Bubba Smith and many other HOFer Colts. (Brother still has the ball).

Needless to say I was a Colts fan.   However, when they left in 1984 I was an NFL fan without a team.  Hated Indy for stealing my team though it really was the AH Irsay.   Fortunately my friend and I joined a fantasy league (where you mailed in your weekly team) $5 buck per week, $1 per trade or FA pick up.   We did that for a couple of years.   

Obviously in 1993 when we were awarded the Panthers I became a fan.

If the Panthers were not around I would have to say I would have jumped on the Raven's bandwagon when they moved from Cleveland o Baltimore.  Johnny Unitas, my childhood hero, was allowed to roam the sidelines in Baltimore until he died in 2002.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Skins are the team I grew up with, that being said since they changed ownership I could not see myself rooting for them.  The whole organization just seems to have taken a nosedive.  Probabaly the Steelers even though Ben makes it hard to really like them, but they use to have pretty solid defenses and I enjoy watching good defensive football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got into football about the same time as the Panthers came about so Carolina's the only team I've ever rooted for (and been on that wagon since '95), so tough to say. I live in KC but never cared for the Chiefs so not sure that I'd have any team allegiance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got into football in the first place solely because of the Panthers' great 2013 season. I was in the Navy on deployment at the time, and on the weekly ship newsletter we'd get NFL scores, and I noticed my hometown Panthers kept winning week after week (after a weak start.) That got me interested enough to actually learn the rules of the game so I could know what I was watching. 

That said, I only cared enough to check the scores because of how much I'd enjoyed the 49ers/Ravens Super Bowl earlier in the year, and became fond of both the Seahawks and Washington state after visiting for a while. So I'd likely support Seattle and Baltimore with no hometown team, if I watched NFL at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...