Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alvin Kamara talks about the Minnesota Miracle


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I think this is solo thread worthy.  You might think so too after you read Kamara's...eloquent take on last year's playoff loss.

Alvin Kamara has some choice words about the Minnesota Miracle

 

Quote

“It’s a certain point where you f–king just do everything could do, and s–t still don’t go your way,” Kamara said. “That’s how I felt about that game. I felt like we did everything. We came all the way back, and then s–t just happened like that. That’s like some one-in-a-million-type s–t.

“I couldn’t even be mad. I was mad, of course, but it was like how does that even f–king happen? That’s not even real. It’s almost not realistic, like what the f–k?”

 

Quote

His greater point holds, as the Saints were on an incredible roll before Stefon Diggs‘ last-second game-winning touchdown sent the Vikings to the NFC Championship Game. And Kamara believes that momentum would have continued against the Eagles, and he clearly thinks it will continue into this season now that they’ve put it behind them.

“We’d beat the s–t out of [the Eagles] cause we was rolling,” Kamara said. “If we won [against the Vikings], I knew nobody was gonna stop us cause we came all the way back. . . .

“We know what the standard is. So, yeah, f-k Minnesota.”

 

So...yeah.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mikey818 said:

Haha they still have Marcus Williams as the starting safety so we can beat them 

Williams would walk into your safety room and be the best player in there, and it wouldn't be particularly close.

Also, Panthers are 0-3 against the Saints with Williams as a starting safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:


The Eagles were clearly superior to every team in the NFC, Saints included.  

 

I don't believe that.  I believe the Eagles had that special mentality much like the Panthers did in 2003, was just something about them.  But to be honest, on paper the Saints were the better team and I agree they could have beat the Eagles if they played them.  Thankfully that never happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:


The Eagles were clearly superior to every team in the NFC, Saints included.  

 

We could've beaten them. When we played them earlier in the season we had how many ridiculous turnovers and still were right there? I had every confidence the Panthers could've won the SB last year. But I say that every year soooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Neither Barkley nor even a healthy CMC would move the needle much for us. Those are guys that impact teams that already have impressive overall offenses and defenses, so they can perform the complimentary roles that make them actually valuable. We should know that specifically because CMC almost never moved the needle on bad Panthers team after bad Panthers team. Ask Giants fans about that with Saquon.
    • I would generally disagree. You see a lot more load management than previously but that is because being healthy in the playoffs is such a key factor. Different philosophies in that regard than previous generations.  Baseball really doesn't matter until at least halfway through the season. I am not gonna say they don't play hard but the physical demands are infinitesimal in the MLB in comparison to basically any other major pro sport.  People dislike all the shooting these days but that's a direct correlation with how much the overall skill level of the average NBA player has drastically risen over the past 15ish years. There are other aggravating factors, certainly, but that is the biggest one in terms of playing style differences. So many of the guys from the 80's and 90's wouldn't even be able to play in the modern NBA at all. The biggest problem the NBA has with the American market(they are the only US sport that has any real international appeal or interest, minus the NHL) is that they are so steadily corrupt and fix the systems against the small market teams. Well, you eventually lose a big chunk of the league viewership/potential viewership in the process. Take the very obviously fixed NBA draft lotteries. Superstar and upper tier star players rarely want to play for small market teams, nor can they usually afford to pay them. So how do you expect them to possibly compete in that environment?
    • The Tsar awaits...
×
×
  • Create New...