Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So they DO notice


XOBlackxJokerOX

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Jackofalltrades said:

Whitlock finally sees the light,

Not a Whitlock fan but I think he nailed this one.

Yes he did, and it's a big man (no pun) who can publicly state, with no equivocation, that he was wrong about a player.  Very few sportscasters are man enough to do that.  Interesting that he went on record as forecasting the panthers to end the season with a better record than Atlanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Whitlock pretty much said what a lot of us fans have been thinking about how Cam played and the big problem with the offense: his wr's let him down. I'm surprised. Pleasantly surprised. It always takes time for a QB to gell with a new OC and Cam and Norv may just be on the same page now. Close enough that they have to drag the wr's up to snuff. Can't wait for Sunday!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Professor Chaos said:

There is no reason for this thread to exist other than it making CANs happy that someone said something nice about Cam. This is the exact kind of trash I'm trying to take out. The TEAM lost, and Cam Newton is a part of that TEAM.

Dont be a douche

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...