Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steelers dropped 40 on the Falcons.

Snake

By Snake,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Ludwig23 said:

And we struggled and lost to them . See what a good pocket passer can do ? 

Ben made a lot of throws on the run and a lot of outside the pocket throws.  Hes great at moving his pocket, making throws on the run etc,..

The Steelers defense showed up too-- that always helps.  I was stuck watching that game instead of the Panthers,.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoenheim Grand Master

Hoenheim

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's been said that both the Falcons and the Saints have figured out how to beat Rivera's defense.

Much as I hate to admit it, that might be a valid observation.

we have no pass rush , I think our secondary has been doing pretty good especially despite the lack of rush

LBs haven't been doing great which is largely a product of the Dline getting owned this season

We need a really good young pass rusher like D.Lawrence or Hardy when he was here . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We still have to play them again. That's a worry. They're still an awful match up for us on paper. Styles make fights.

Yeah but by the time we do they will be playing for a draft pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cardiackat88.
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By cardiackat88. · Posted

      Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...