Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess what grade PFF gave Cam?


TN05

Recommended Posts

Seems fair in all honesty.  The entire offense was bad save for a few plays through the first 3 quarters, even though Cam was responsible for pretty much all the offense we were able to eek out.  Then Cam played at like a 99.9% in the fourth.

So if you average Cam being about 65 (slightly above average for 3 quarters) and 100 for the fourth, you basically end up with ~74.

Anyway, I don't have a clue how they do their math but it seems reasonably representative of the overall body of work for Cam yesterday.

In the end, he was unbelievably clutch in the 4th and got the win.  A 100 in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are QBs throwing 350+ yards and 3+ TDs regularly. Our offense is tepid compared to some of these 2018 stick-moving machines.

I don't think clutch offense and carrying an offense are factored into PFF, which is how you get the grade above. It's not meant to be subjective like you apparently want it to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam goes 25/39 (64%), 269 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT . . . and rushes 7 times for 49 yards . . . and wins?  On the road?  Against the champs?

I get you don't want subjective, I respect that.  But it should definitely take winning and losing into account.  There's nothing subjective there.  Same with being on the road vs at home.

This is exactly the Cam we - and all the experts - wanted to see for years.  Limited mistakes.  Good completion percentage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

Cam goes 25/39 (64%), 269 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT . . . and rushes 7 times for 49 yards . . . and wins?  On the road?  Against the champs?

I get you don't want subjective, I respect that.  But it should definitely take winning and losing into account.  There's nothing subjective there.  Same with being on the road vs at home.

This is exactly the Cam we - and all the experts - wanted to see for years.  Limited mistakes.  Good completion percentage.

No worries, winning is the key.  He get's an A from me.  We won, solid stats.  Let the trolls quibble over the other 3 quarters.  Coaches finally adjusted, Cam got into a good rhythm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So you can explain how he was top 10....but won't.  We need to look it up ourselves?  I googled it.  Can't find the argument based on stats and facts. 
    • Well, I think Nike has it all down to a sweet mathematical science to max revenue of what they average person will buy in terms of price....and what the average person will do with a dirty jersey.   Then they construct them accordingly.   and yeah, it's not about being tackled in them but I'm sure Nike knows exactly how each tier will react to washings...and then sunlight, heat, fading and on and on.    Just asking google about it there are tons of tiktoks, you tubes, reddit posts, etc with folks complaining about what a simple wash can do to a new one.    Your washing machine gets cooler tech....so you pay more now and it doesn't last as long .  My son's football cleats that help max speed got a hole in them before they even made it into the season this past year.     Now our football jersey's are lightweight with new mesh because it's totally better.....the end game is always because the big corporations have found the synergy between new and improved and not lasting as long.  That's my take.  I think everything is made to wear out sooner under the guise of but it's better today. 
    • I know Svech is hot but I still like Jarvy with Aho's line
×
×
  • Create New...