Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Devin Funchess


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I said it earlier, dude is carrying KB's torch for big, lazy, dumb receiever.

It's why i never wanted him.  He isn't a football player, just a big guy.  And now that he's been demoted, he is completely disengaged.  I've seen him quit on 2 routes today and jog around without throwing a block on 2 others.  Glad the consensus is coming around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He plays like it's spring practice and we're just going throw the motions. Does not seem to be concerned or care if he runs the wrong route, runs at half speed, and drops balls in big situations. 

He's never been a guy you throw it up to and expect him to outman his guy (Despite his size). So if his route running is this lazy, he gives us nothing. 

OH and I swear I always catch him standing around on broken running plays he could be blocking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, SOJA said:

He plays like it's spring practice and we're just going throw the motions. Does not seem to be concerned or care if he runs the wrong route, runs at half speed, and drops balls in big situations. 

He's never been a guy you throw it up to and expect him to outman his guy (Despite his size). So if his route running is this lazy, he gives us nothing. 

OH and I swear I always catch him standing around on broken running plays he could be blocking

I remember hearing him blame cam on a hot mic during the detroit game after the pass that hit him in the hands while he was sitting on the ground.  Since then, Cam barely looks his way, as he shouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

I remember hearing him blame cam on a hot mic during the detroit game after the pass that hit him in the hands while he was sitting on the ground.  Since then, Cam barely looks his way, as he shouldn't.

What was said? I missed that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Fitting that the game ends on an INT thrown to a half assing it Devin Funchess. I won't watch another game as long as this waste of oxygen remains on the roster. He absolutely should be released right fuging now.

Funchess ran a crossing route. Cam threw it 6 feet over his head.

Cams last 3 throws today-

Behind Curtis.

Over Wright.

Over Funchess.

Everybody ran the wrong route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Funchess ran a crossing route. Cam threw it 6 feet over his head.

Cams last 3 throws today-

Behind Curtis.

Over Wright.

Over Funchess.

Everybody ran the wrong route.

Cam threw the right ball to Curtis. He threw to the shoulder away from the defender. Curtis looked over the wrong shoulder. 

Cam threw high to Wright.

Cam appeared to throw high to Funchess, but who knows if ot was a miscommunication or where Funchess was actually supposed to be? Chris Carter seemed to think it was likely a miscommunication and he's forgotten more about route running than all of us on this forum combined will ever know. Cam and Funchess had already had another miscommunication earlier on Funchess' first target. The only thing I can say for sure abkut that play is that Funchess ran a half assed, half speed, disinterested route just like he had been doing all game long. The Detroit drop fest was one thing, but today's piss poor effort should get him cut tomorrow morning. His role has been reduced and he's sulking. Let him sulk at home or let some other team give him a shot. No one is benefitting from him staying on this roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...