Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2016 - Our Biggest Mistake


Ship

Recommended Posts

I've stewed on this thought for a long time now. If I had to pick one mistake we made in 2016 that truly screwed us up going forward, it was our choice of CB FA after letting Norman walk.

People have lots of opinions about letting Josh walk in the first place, and that really isn't my concern here. What's more important is what we did after. As everyone knows, we made a move everyone thought was pretty smart... for like a couple weeks, in signed Brandon Boykin. He had a lot of promise as a player, but we did a shitty check on his injury history and obviously he didn't even make it to camp. Instead of Boykin, Casey Hayward was available at an affordable price. I don't think we even looked at Hayward. Instead, he signed with the Chargers and has been a CB1 for them since. Had we signed Hayward to a similar contract and only needed to draft Bradberry-- who would obviously be CB2, we'd have a really solid secondary group and I think our defense would be better off overall.

I remember him being signed not long after our Boykin move. I truly believe we blew a good opportunity on a guy who wasn't bad at the time and who clearly had the chops to continue and develop. I think it was a huge mistake and had we signed him, maybe we draft some different guys at Worley and Sanchez's spots that would still be here or be more impactful.

Now, Jackson is great and I'm not certain we'd have taken him if we had two starters, but who really cares? could have grabbed some nice talent at that spot somewhere else too.

Anyway, just wanted to get that off my chest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything about 2016 sucked ass. I will say, letting Norman walk hurt, but giving him 75 mil (50 guaranteed) to a 29 year old cb was not a good idea. I really wish we stuck with the tag. Drafting Butler was awful as well and then making up for Norman by wasting two other picks on CBS (2 aren’t even here anymore plus trading up for Worley) oh wee mayne. I like Gettleman, but that offseason was his doom. Sheesh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Norman has not been the world beater in Washington---he wanted elite money and has only had 1 pro bowl season---his contract year.  CB was not our problem this year, but I would like to have Norman. 

 

Agree to a point,  We also lost an "attitude' when we lost Norman--we still haven't regained it.

Thanks Gettleman-the greatest  GM in the history of any sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ras977 said:

Agree to a point,  We also lost an "attitude' when we lost Norman--we still haven't regained it.

Thanks Gettleman-the greatest  GM in the history of any sport.

There was no answer.  You save the $16m, I get it, but answer to the loss.  A second and third round tandem? Rookies?  Ugh.

Bradberry has developed, but the attitude you mentioned made it hard for a CB from Samford to step into those shoes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2016 was when the honeymoon with gman was over. His ego seemed to have gotten the better and his magic began to erode faster as well.

  Hayward theory is interesting, Boykin was given 400,000 and a cup of coffee. I remember Dave stating " You can not go into the season with a question mark at punter, I can not do that to Ron" He did what said you can not do- panic by trading 4th for a vet punter. I don't know in what world you think going into the season with 2 rookies starting at CB is "fine: but not an unproven punter. I know they were hoping for Bene to play a role, he took much longer to recover. He's still recovering til his day.

   Free agency is very complicated. Many things have to take place ie the team has to want player X, a contract agreed upon, and (the most underrated part) the player has to want to come. Most have a family by their 2nd contract time. Salary cap plays a role too.  Many other factors coaches, systems, supply/demand. Panthers could have wanted Hayward badly, but one of many factors didn't make it work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Quoted rom one of the many Bryce threads... Wanted to reply to this, but since my answer turned into a go route (i.e. went long) I thought I'd put it in a separate thread. So here's my take on the names mentioned above (and others) ... Lance was a prototypical "take an athlete and teach him to play quarterback" example who now serves as an example of why that's a bad idea. Worth remembering that Lance was given to a coach heralded as a QB guru with a friendly system. In the end though, even that potentially ideal situation wasn't enough. And the fact those events were followed up by said guru taking his team to the Super Bowl with a QB who went undrafted helps bolster the folly.of that approach. But then you have Wilson, an actual quarterback with off the charts passing skill. This guy's sure to succeed, right? Well...wrong, which demonstrates that even the right skill set doesn't guarantee success.  Could Wilson have succeeded in a better situation under better coaching? Unknown, but it's a question I find myself asking a lot. (See also: Levis, Will) Rosen falls into the Ryan Leaf / Ryan Mallet category, i.e. don't hand the keys to your billion dollar franchise over to a dickhead. Character matters, and not strictly in the 'upright citizen vs thuggish criminal ' way. (I could add maybe don't draft guys with the first name 'Ryan' unless they went to Harvard, and even then only in the 7th round) Darnold is another guy who likely could have benefited from a better situation / coaching (see also Carr: David). Heck, it also might have helped to send him to The Wizard and have him ask for "da noiv", or perhaps to Egon Spengler and company to chase away any and all "ghosts". Sending him to Matt Rhule? 😬 Yeah...definitely not the answer 😕 But hey, at least he's doing better now. (ttill playoff time, anyway) Mind you, Drew Brees does serve as proof that guys who land in less than ideal - or just flat out lousy - situations early on can indeed resurrect their careers later on in better surroundings. Will Darnold go that far? Unknown, but we do know it's possible. Kenny Pickett (also known by the X-Men moniker 'Littlehand') is that proverbial great college quarterback who for one reason or another just doesn't cut it in the pros.  (gotta say, feels like the past several drafts have put forth a lot of that particular QB archetype) Mac Jones could arguably carry this label as well, though I'm waiting to see how things play out in San Francisco. For now, Jones might be a better example of why you should always be cautious and skeptical of guys from certain systems. Justin Fields is a cell in that spreadsheet column, as is Kyler Murray. Now I'm sure someone here will mention another certain quarterback we're all quite familiar with as a prime example of this subset too 😐 Fair point, though I think he, Murray and Tagovailoa work better under the heading of "Davids". What's a David? It's a guy you send to battle against a "Goliath". And by all means, bet on that guy if he's a shepherd.  If he's a quarterback, though? 🤔 Root for him, encourage him, appreciate his courage and be inspired by him... ...but don't draft him. The return on investment might be a great story, but it's not likely to be one that involves championships and rings. ... Bottom Line? You've no doubt heard this saying "this ain't rocket science".  Well, I'd argue saying "this ain't quarterback evaluation" might truly make a better negative metaphorical comparison. At least with rocket science, it's science. You're working with things that have some level of consistency, even predictability. Stuff like chemistry, physics, metallurgy, etc. Human beings?  Specifically young male athletes with massive amounts of ego and testosterone who've been heavily catered to a lot of their lives and have now been handed large sums money and a portal to fame... Yeah, good luck with thatb😖 Heck, you might get better odds buying a Powerball ticket, or perhaps playing a roulette wheel at a Vegas casino. (gambling involves risk; please play responsibility. for help with gambling addiction call the Gambling Hotline at 1-800-522-4700)
    • The sad part is Williams led the league in rushing tds as well with like 18 and didn't even make the pro bowl that season.  Too bad it all ended in Jake's epic collapse 
    • Yeah. He talked about using him that way and I forget the term. Maybe nickel LB? Ike have to watch it again.    If you look at the video it is maybe 2/3 through where talks about him and also CSW.     
×
×
  • Create New...