Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Now that one of our two best Free agents have been signed......


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

How do you feel about who we can sign and how our team will shape up? If we can get Williams under contract and cut Kalil I believe we will really have a great start to the offseason. Reid and Williams were/are the two most important free agents to shape the future of our team. If we sign Williams we realistically only need a center, and now that we have signed Reid we can go FA/Draft/Searcy/Gaulden for the other side, and focus on the line in the draft. Think of the hole we would have been in at safety if we didn’t sign Reid in our new hybrid 3/4 and we missed on FA? Great signing in my opinion and with only 10 million guaranteed it makes it even better (I think we all cringe still thinking of Matt Kalils guaranteed money) 

 

UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENTS

  • S Mike Adams
  • RB Cameron Artis-Payne
  • RB Kenjon Barner
  • RB Travaris Cadet
  • K Chandler Catanzaro
  • OT Chris Clark
  • LB Thomas Davis
  • WR Devin Funchess
  • DE Wes Horton
  • LB Ben Jacobs
  • S Colin Jones
  • C Ryan Kalil (retiring)
  • DT Kyle Love
  • LB David Mayo
  • OT Marshall Newhouse
  • DE Julius Peppers (retiring)
  • S Eric Reid
  • G Amini Silatolu
  • RB Fozzy Whittaker
  • OT Daryl Williams

0DF81235-B2AC-44D0-B1CB-A1AFA25605A5.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of that list Clark (depth), Love, and Williams are the three I definitely want back, with maybe Mayo as well depending on how the staff feels about the new guys form last year. Most everyone else I feel is replaceable if the money isn't right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:
  • S Mike Adams
  • RB Cameron Artis-Payne 
  • RB Kenjon Barner
  • RB Travaris Cadet 
  • K Chandler Catanzaro
  • OT Chris Clark
  • LB Thomas Davis
  • WR Devin Funchess
  • DE Wes Horton
  • LB Ben Jacobs
  • S Colin Jones
  • C Ryan Kalil (retiring)
  • DT Kyle Love
  • LB David Mayo
  • OT Marshall Newhouse
  • DE Julius Peppers (retiring)
  • S Eric Reid
  • G Amini Silatolu
  • RB Fozzy Whittaker
  • OT Daryl Williams
  • S Mike Adams - Keep
  • RB Cameron Artis-Payne - Keep
  • RB Kenjon Barner - Release
  • RB Travaris Cadet - Dunno
  • K Chandler Catanzaro - Dunno
  • OT Chris Clark - Keep
  • LB Thomas Davis - Gone? Sadface 
  • WR Devin Funchess - Keep
  • DE Wes Horton - KEEP
  • LB Ben Jacobs - Keep
  • S Colin Jones - Keep
  • C Ryan Kalil (retiring) - Gone
  • DT Kyle Love - Keep
  • LB David Mayo - KEEP
  • OT Marshall Newhouse - Dunno
  • DE Julius Peppers (retiring) - Gone
  • S Eric Reid - Signed
  • G Amini Silatolu - ummm no?
  • RB Fozzy Whittaker - Release
  • OT Daryl Williams - KEEP

Thats a tall order if Hurney keeps signing horrible contracts. 

I know people aren’t a bit fan of Mike Adams but I like him unless we can get a better replacement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OT is just uch a massive question mark until we know what's going to happen with Williams. We could potentially be set with our starting OTs or we could potentially have a massive need for a starting OT. Right now it's just a huge unknown for us fans, but I'd be willing to bet that our front office has a pretty good idea of what we're looking at there. Let's just say that I'm concerned on that front.

Pass rusher is obvious. I think we're in a situation where we have to both add an impact free agent and draft another one fairly early. We have one proven NFL edge rusher on the roster and he's on the wrong side of 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we cut Kalil and use that money plus remaining space to resign Darryl Williams.

It will require using a lot of money for our OT's (especially for one not on the roster), but it will basically be like paying starter level money for both OT's since Moton is still on his cheap rookie deal.

The wasted money for Kalil will pretty much be used up this year, and we will have more money available after that for the Moton extension.

Moton (LT), Van Roten (LG), Larsen (C), Turner (RG), Williams (RT) would be a much better lineup than what we have had in a long time.

Larsen and Van Roten are just serviceable, and maybe there is an opportunity to upgrade, but fixing the OT position is paramount.

I would rather resign Williams and have a basically intact OLine and focus the draft on defense personally.

Resigning Clark to a team-friendly deal would be great, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

OT is just uch a massive question mark until we know what's going to happen with Williams. We could potentially be set with our starting OTs or we could potentially have a massive need for a starting OT. Right now it's just a huge unknown for us fans, but I'd be willing to bet that our front office has a pretty good idea of what we're looking at there. Let's just say that I'm concerned on that front.

Pass rusher is obvious. I think we're in a situation where we have to both add an impact free agent and draft another one fairly early. We have one proven NFL edge rusher on the roster and he's on the wrong side of 30.

Right.

The reason we can't really gauge things:

Does Williams return?  If so, where is the evidence we like Moton at LT?  So we have a LT with a small sample of work and a RT with a bad knee---not exactly an ironclad arrangement.  Maybe it would be smarter to leave Moton at RT and sign or draft a LT.  Who knows?  I think Moton can play LT---but do the Panthers?

DE changes if we go 3-4, so we can't even count on what that need will be.

DT changes if  we go 3-4.  a NT would be in the cards either way, I guess.

So your phrasing is right--pass rusher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

I hope we cut Kalil and use that money plus remaining space to resign Darryl Williams.

It will require using a lot of money for our OT's (especially for one not on the roster), but it will basically be like paying starter level money for both OT's since Moton is still on his cheap rookie deal.

The wasted money for Kalil will pretty much be used up this year, and we will have more money available after that for the Moton extension.

Moton (LT), Van Roten (LG), Larsen (C), Turner (RG), Williams (RT) would be a much better lineup than what we have had in a long time.

Larsen and Van Roten are just serviceable, and maybe there is an opportunity to upgrade, but fixing the OT position is paramount.

I would rather resign Williams and have a basically intact OLine and focus the draft on defense personally.

Resigning Clark to a team-friendly deal would be great, too.

I am not seeing the Larsen love.  He is a backup, in my opinion.  Correct about the OL being better than we have had--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I am not seeing the Larsen love.  He is a backup, in my opinion.  Correct about the OL being better than we have had--

Not disagreeing, but I would rather fix the OT situation even if that means rolling with Larsen in the short-term.  Also, finding an upgrade in the middle rounds of the draft at Center is much easier than at OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I am not seeing the Larsen love.  He is a backup, in my opinion.  Correct about the OL being better than we have had--

Agreed. Larsen is great depth for C/G but I will be nervous if he enters next year as our starter, and not having depth behind him. Getting free agent center or drafting one is an absolute must.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Right.

The reason we can't really gauge things:

Does Williams return?  If so, where is the evidence we like Moton at LT?  So we have a LT with a small sample of work and a RT with a bad knee---not exactly an ironclad arrangement.  Maybe it would be smarter to leave Moton at RT and sign or draft a LT.  Who knows?  I think Moton can play LT---but do the Panthers?

DE changes if we go 3-4, so we can't even count on what that need will be.

DT changes if  we go 3-4.  a NT would be in the cards either way, I guess.

So your phrasing is right--pass rusher. 

I think Moton can play LT too. Yeah, he may be better suited at RT, but most OTs are. RT is the easier position to play. Gross was a very good LT but he probably would've been one of the best RTs of all time had we left him there. 

LTs are hard as hell to find. It's why bums like Matt Kalil's can make megamillions in free agency. If you have a guy who can hold the position down, you gotta play him there. To hell with whether or not he's better at RT. Especially when you have a former 2nd team All-Pro already at RT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...