Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some notes from my source involving the NFL draft


Verge

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, it's that time of the year again, and my guy has been giving me some info about this years draft class. For those who don't know, my friend works within a scouting department of an NFL team, not the Carolina Panthers, and he has been kind enough to kind of help me learn to scout, write scouting reports, and leak me some info as far as what the general public might be missing in the NFL draft. 

-Kyler Murray is believed to be the #1 pick in this draft, regardless of if the Cardinals keep or trade the pick 
-Expectations are three QBs within the top 12 picks 

-Daniel Jones should be the second quarterback taken within the top 10 
-Expect Andre Dillard and Jonah Williams to volley for the #1 offensive lineman off the board 
-He does not believe a corner will be taken in the top 10 
____________________________________________________________________________




04/24
***Final predictions****
Andre Dillard either goes to Bengals or Bills 
Kyler Murray goes #1 
Daniel Jones either goes at 6 to NYG or they trade up to get him
Hollywood Brown is the first receiver taken 
Jonah Williams goes in the top 10 
At least five offensive lineman in the top 20
TJ Hockenson in the top 12, probably to the Lions 
Denver passes on a QB for a LB 
Redskins trade up for Haskins or Jones 
Only one safety in the first round 
Greedy Williams falls out of the first 







 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting about the Kyler Murray, and even moreso that Daniel Jones as the #2 QB.  Thatll throw eveyone on a loop as everyone and there brother have Jones as the 4th QB mocked claiming their sources.  

Also interested no mention of Jawaan Taylor, after about unanimous elsewhere now have him as the top OT.  I truely feel sorry for any QB and RB whose team Drafts Dillard early and starts him.  He is going to get someone hurt

 

Also interesting of Zach Allen as everyone has been writing how his stock flopped after the seniorbowl.  He had a terrible seniorbowl week and showed he can't play the edge.  Will have to be a 3-4 DE as rhe only thing he did  the entire week was on a inside rush on a OG 

Ferguson, the combine wouldve really helped him.  His biggest question mark was his athletic ability.

 

I love Harry, dude reminds me of Drandre Hopkins coming out.

Ridley is a stud to, super polished.  If he played at any other school he'd have a lot more hype.  Id expect his hype train to start at the combine if he test well as expected

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Zach Allen is just a name. He looked awful at the Senior Bowl. A first round DE who can’t pressure the QB? I wouldn’t want him at 47 based on what I saw and there were decent OL at the Senior Bowl so he was going against real NFL talent. There’s been Senior Bowls before with awful OL, but this was decent OL and he was stonewalled every play.

Agree with you on Taylor as well. I’d bet after yesterday that he’s cemented the top spot or maybe #2 behind Williams. Dillard reminds me more of Gesicki at TE last year. Solid combine numbers but based on the drills and Senior Bowl, he just might be an athlete first. Gesicki was just awful in drills so I’m not saying I wouldn’t want Dillard later or that he’s bad but the drills/Senior Bowl work shows the non-measurables. 

I still want to see what Allen does at the combine 

He did show some flashes to me as a guy who could be a solid 3-4 DE based how he could rush inside 

Nfl.com doesn't even have him listed as s edge anymore, they have him as a DL

 

Dillard reminds me of Spriggs?  Who Greenbay drafted in the 2nd but never panned out.  

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/jason-spriggs?id=2555197

Dillard is great in gym shorts like Spriggs, but comes from a even more gimmicky offense that doesn really require to run block, never take on a Bull Rush, and only ever require to really take on his guy as they dont see more than 4 man rushes often.  And it showed, in the light contact badic footwork drills he thrived like yesterday but once full contact like scrimmage and actual game.  He got abused.  It was litterally so bad, that after the very first play of the senior bowl, he got rocked and pushed right into the QB.  That his coaches had that LSU TE lineup beside him and help double team on blocks on about every other play in the first half.  Then when they gave him another shot solo blocking, he got destroyed for a strip sack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

Yep. Reminds me (again not as bad in drills) as Gesicki last year. I don’t know how any team could watch the TE drills and think he’d be a good TE and yet he goes early 2nd. There’s always a chance these guys improve but someone will take him in the first and be very disappointed and it was obvious. 

2 words

Athletic.......Ability 

 

 

I didnt think he bad at all in drills, but you flipped the game film and woah.  None of that was to be found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...