Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Daryl Williams and the franchise tag


t96

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're worth what the market says you're worth. If someone gives it to him then he didn't overvalue anything.

Kind of agree. There are definitely instances when teams overpay (Lord knows we've done it a few times).

Williams is betting on himself, and in a market where guys of average talent have been known to get above average pay, it's kind of hard to blame him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, t96 said:

To all those responding “no way,” can you say what you’d be willing to pay on a 1 year deal?

With a knee with a clean bill of health or with a medically red flagged knee? That's the key piece of info all of us are missing and other teams' medical staff may or may not come to the same conclusions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

With a knee with a clean bill of health or with a medically red flagged knee? That's the key piece of info all of us are missing and other teams' medical staff may or may not come to the same conclusions.

There’s no indication that he isn’t recovering just fine so for the sake of discussion we’ll assume his knee looks good, but you can certainly take into account that he missed last season due to an injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, t96 said:

To all those responding “no way,” can you say what you’d be willing to pay on a 1 year deal?

Million or two more than our savings from cutting Kalil as a June 1.

So, sub 8M or so...which he wouldn't take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't give him any more than a one year prove it deal at $5 M, or a three year deal averaging about $4 M with incentives.

OL and leg injuries scare me. No way am I guaranteeing a guy coming back from that kind of injury a lot of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, t96 said:

There’s no indication that he isn’t recovering just fine so for the sake of discussion we’ll assume his knee looks good, but you can certainly take into account that he missed last season due to an injury.

If there was a RT specific franchise tag it would probably be in the $8M range, would that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offer what we’re willing to offer and go from there, if neogotiations get to high in price just let him walk, transition tag would be interesting if he had put together 2 solid seasons but it’s best to not take a big gamble signing him long term or to big money until he at least puts together another season 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he was recovered and healthy we should try a long term deal. But it depends on his health at this point. I wouldn't exclusive franchise him but would consider the transition tag if I didn't want to lose him and thought we could sign him long-term. Depends on how much he wants and if I thought I could replace him cheaper.  Don't think we can pay 11million for him if we couldn't or didn't want to sign him long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im confused with some of our fans.

Im seeing a lot of people saying we can't afford FA's and we don't need to overspend for our own FA's. So what exactly is you guys plan in FA?

*Newsflash if you want good players you are going to spend big to sign them. Williams will be one of the top RT's on the market. He will cost a lot. How do people not understand the market?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If his knee is healthy, I take Bobby Massie's recently signed contract to Daryl's agent and say, "Take this and add 10% across the board."

Bobby Massie signed a 4 year, $32 million contract with the Chicago Bears on January 31, 2019. Per Brad Biggs, Massie received $15.8 million in guarantees including a $6.5 million signing bonus. Every year of the contract will have a team option and the final year is voidble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...