Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The catch-all Huddler Panthers mock draft thread (mods please sticky)


Bronn

Recommended Posts

All lineman draft. Two DEs that can play the 3-4 DE role. Dremont to back up short. A NT, then an OT that can play LG (deiter) and a development OT and a flyer on Alex bars who could learn at center. If he can get healthy he has starter traits.

Screenshot_20190403-190702.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Panthero said:

All lineman draft. Two DEs that can play the 3-4 DE role. Dremont to back up short. A NT, then an OT that can play LG (deiter) and a development OT and a flyer on Alex bars who could learn at center. If he can get healthy he has starter traits.

Screenshot_20190403-190702.png

Got my best one yet. Never gonna happen but this was the best one I think I've had. Screenshot_20190403-203515_Brave.thumb.jpg.ad490e4c2e9cb642cad6fe4f688f0667.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2019 at 1:12 PM, heel31ok said:

Love the Dillard pick...and position wise you hit the right buttons...

Even though this draft doesn't have a stud LT, Dillard is the best one out there.  Most folks think Jonah Williams will move inside in the League and the other top tackles project to the right side.  Even if Dillard is the top reserve swing tackle this season as he learns the pro system and works on his run blocking (including upper body strength) it still will be worth it.  There are zero guarantees with Daryl Williams.  It's almost a lose/lose situation with him.   He either doesn't bounce back or he balls this season and splits with a huge contract offer.  In either case we move Moton back to the right and have Dillard ready to start in 2020.  Then you have solid bookend tackles for a few years.

DEs take time to develop and I have us drafting two so they can grow together like KK and Star did at DT.  In a couple years we have our bookend DEs.  By 2020 we have our bookend OTs and DEs.  

Sills IV is obviously Fun-Fun's replacement and our red zone target.   Like Chris Carter, all the guy does is catch TDs.

Pollard is a sneaky candidate to be the CMC clone the team is looking for.  He was a RB, WR and KR for Memphis, but as a reserve, not the top guy which is why he's not drawing a ton of attention.

I threw in a big-bodied CB (Ballentine) to compete on the outside which would allow Jackson to kick inside to play nickle.  I'm hoping his small school status causes him to fall compared to a guy with similar attributes in a power 5 conference.

As far as FS, Hooker is the best one I project remaining on the board when we pick at that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Even though this draft doesn't have a stud LT, Dillard is the best one out there.  Most folks think Jonah Williams will move inside in the League and the other top tackles project to the right side.  Even if Dillard is the top reserve swing tackle this season as he learns the pro system and works on his run blocking (including upper body strength) it still will be worth it.  There are zero guarantees with Daryl Williams.  It's almost a lose/lose situation with him.   He either doesn't bounce back or he balls this season and splits with a huge contract offer.  In either case we move Moton back to the right and have Dillard ready to start in 2020.  Then you have solid bookend tackles for a few years.

DEs take time to develop and I have us drafting two so they can grow together like KK and Star did at DT.  In a couple years we have our bookend DEs.  By 2020 we have our bookend OTs and DEs.  

Sills IV is obviously Fun-Fun's replacement and our red zone target.   Like Chris Carter, all the guy does is catch TDs.

Pollard is a sneaky candidate to be the CMC clone the team is looking for.  He was a RB, WR and KR for Memphis, but as a reserve, not the top guy which is why he's not drawing a ton of attention.

I threw in a big-bodied CB (Ballentine) to compete on the outside which would allow Jackson to kick inside to play nickle.  I'm hoping his small school status causes him to fall compared to a guy with similar attributes in a power 5 conference.

As far as FS, Hooker is the best one I project remaining on the board when we pick at that spot.

My thoughts exactly on Dillard...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did a 7-rd mock w/ trades with a group of friends from college that I'm in an ultra-competitive fantasy league with.

I ended up not making any trades, tho in the 1st the NYG GM traded up from 17 to 15 to take Montez Sweat after somehow landing Quinnen Williams at #6. Hope that isnt foreshadowing.


1. Brian Burns, DE/OLB, Florida St
2. Chris Lindstrom, LG, Boston College
3. Darnell Savage, FS, Maryland
3. Max Scharping, LT, Northern Illinois
4. Christian Miller, OLB/DE, Alabama
5. Bryce Love, RB, Stanford
6. Jalen Hurd, WR, Baylor

 

I think this will end up being my final mock, barring any news such as injuries or arrests. I like how it gives us both our OLBs in a 3-4 while also giving us a DE + SLB in 4-3s. Lindstrom and Scharping could be the left side of the OL for the future. Savage would provide us a centerfielder that can also come down into the box to challenge the run. Bryce Love gives an option should CMC get hurt and Jalen Hurd provides WR/RB flexibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picks:
Round 1 Pick 16: Burns, Brian, DE, Florida State (A-)
Round 2 Pick 15: Abram, Johnathan, FS, Mississippi State (A)
Round 3 Pick 13: Lindstrom, Chris, OG, Boston College (A+)
Round 3 Pick 36 (COMP): Johnson Jr, Lonnie, CB, Kentucky (A+)
Round 4 Pick 13: Wren, Renell, DT, Arizona State (A+)
Round 5 Pick 16: Hurd, Jalen, WR, Baylor (A+)
Round 6 Pick 16 (CLE): Scharping, Max, OT, Northern Illinois (A+)
Round 7 Pick 2 (K.C.): Anderson, Rodney, RB, Oklahom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...