Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What percentage of music today is Doo Doo?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

It depends on your tastes. There is something out there for everyone.

However, I still find myself listening to albums that are now dated, rather than actively seeking out new things.

Most of main-stream radio is probably junk. 95% is probably close there. Surprisingly, I've like some of the newer country songs more than anything else I've heard on the radio lately.

Mainstream radio rock bands destroyed the genre sometime around Nickleback and Creed.

Rap continues to force feed us disingenuous performers or the next great white hype. That, as well as some of the lazier approaches to lyrics and production that got mainstream in recent years.

I tend to stay in my lanes, I guess, of metal and lesser commercial hip hop.

I do have to admit that I do like artists like The Weeknd and Bruno Mars, but even they haven't done a whole lot lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

The doom genre seems to be doing well right now.  I'm not involved in it myself but it seems like there's a regional or bigger national band coming through Durham or Chapel Hill a few times a month.

Yup, doom has some really good stuff right now and probably the genre of metal I'm mostly following for "new music".    Stuff like Elder, Khemmis, Pallbearer and the recent Sleep album are fantastic.

The good thing about good music is it'll always be good music, tomorrow, 10 years from now, 40 years from now, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s fairly bad IMO including the metal genre that has gotten pretty dried up as well.  One band that has surprisingly stayed pretty good is Judas Preist.  Their recent releases aren’t all time epic but very high quality.  Also, Cannibal Corpse has put out some of their best albums starting with Kill which is absolutely amazing.  My favorite CC but these dudes have put out some killer releases lately.  Torture is outstanding in particular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on where you look, but I do have to agree that the majority of new music coming out isn't good. There are a lot of reasons for this.

The internet and streaming services have given birth to the mainstream DIY band/musician/artist. If you have a mic and Ableton, you can call yourself a "producer". So the music market is so saturated that it's hard to find the gold nuggets when the majority is crap that wouldn't see the light of day decades ago. And the DIY nature of the industry means good songwriters aren't developed and rewarded like they were decades ago. You can't sell records anymore so there's no monetary benefit to fund a band or artist. The only income a musician can expect is live shows and the margins are so thin that no prudent investor wants in on that action.

And if the artist is talented and works really hard, the only time they'll see any sort of funding or help is after they've already made a name for themselves, and an investor can profit off a brand name. Then the artist will likely stop trying to make "good" music and will just make music that sells to pay back an investor. The old adage of selling out is hyper-focused these days. A mid-level touring act you've probably heard of is likely mired in debt or just barely breaking even to tour.

Most young songwriters with big dreams of being a rockstar toil in obscurity for years, then either quit and get a real job and start a family, or fights for decades to get a little scrap of the limelight.

Toss on that in a strictly theoretical sense, all music is just a regurgitation of what came before it, so everything either sounds oddly familiar or awful.

That should answer your question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Older guys, I'm generally curious. Were the "classics" that we have now considered good by the general population when they came out or is it only now that they're considered good? I'm 30, so I guess I'm talking pre-90s. I do agree that general radio sucks, but it sells unfortunately. Plus, the stations only play a handful of people that are considered big nowadays (Beyonce, Ariana, Taylor, Miley, Bruno, etc.) and they play them non-stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Arroz con Panther said:

Older guys, I'm generally curious. Were the "classics" that we have now considered good by the general population when they came out or is it only now that they're considered good? I'm 30, so I guess I'm talking pre-90s. I do agree that general radio sucks, but it sells unfortunately. Plus, the stations only play a handful of people that are considered big nowadays (Beyonce, Ariana, Taylor, Miley, Bruno, etc.) and they play them non-stop.

survivorship bias

basically the fact that they consider that all music made within a range of years was good is because they can’t remember all the garbage that was made during that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do know that Rolling Stone used to have all their reviews trashing Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath albums online but they removed them years ago.

e:

actually never mind

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-album-reviews/led-zeppelin-i-187298/

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-album-reviews/led-zeppelin-ii-182340/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

I do know that Rolling Stone used to have all their reviews trashing Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath albums online but they removed them years ago.

This still goes on today, fwiw. A lot of the metal I am into is, like imho or whatever, the best I have ever heard within the different sub-genres. Yet, I still have to read about stuff like Slipknot, Ghost, and other bands I don't care about/don't really consider metal when I try to go out and get "metal" news and/or new bands to listen to. Not only do they not cover it, but they promote way too much other stuff that nobody cares about.

I know a lot of it falls back onto the bands themselves, management, and labels. But, uggghh.

I'm googling "new Wretched album" like way too often. It has gotten so bad it is almost on pace with googling "The Winds of Winter" lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Shocker said:

It’s fairly bad IMO including the metal genre that has gotten pretty dried up as well.  One band that has surprisingly stayed pretty good is Judas Preist.  Their recent releases aren’t all time epic but very high quality.  Also, Cannibal Corpse has put out some of their best albums starting with Kill which is absolutely amazing.  My favorite CC but these dudes have put out some killer releases lately.  Torture is outstanding in particular.

Latest Judas Priest is their best since 91's Painkiller for sure, top metal album last year overall which is crazy.    Seen them with Deep Purple last year, still killing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not listened to terrestrial radio in almost 15 years. I listen to the blues channel as well as Deep Tracks and a couple other stations, but when I'm looking for "new" music, I feel like I'm spending hours just searching and listening.

In the meantime, my vinyl collection, which sat for decades, is getting new additions and I'm having fun dusting off some of those...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Poster board? Were you trying to use the term poster child?
    • I mean, you're acting like we don't see the tippy-toe bunny hops, jump throws more than normal (with both feet dangling in the air every which a way), and off-platform but off-balance throws that arrive short or sail high. Could that be bad mechanics due to being short? Could a seeming propensity to bail the pocket towards the sidelines early as opposed to sitting in the pocket tall and strong, surveying his reads, be an attempt at trying to see an open throwing lane? I'm not saying that what you're saying isn't a contributing factor to what has been an underwhelming display of executing the QB position, but this is year three, and if the lightbulb hasn't switched on by now---if you haven't figured out that guys are faster, stronger and generally more athletic, then what's it going to take? It's hard to forget that "mental processing" was supposed to be Bryce Young's superpower. Are you telling me that he can't nail down such an easy concept as, "I can't get away with the things I did in college at the pro level," is that right? If he can't get past that, then that surely limits his ability to successfully execute all the other stuff.  Look, I'm not trying to be flippant. I acknowledge that playing pro football is more complex than a lot of fans realize, but all we can do, as fans, is observe. One of my favorite things to do is just look at the greater picture and think what part human nature is playing in the many decisions that are being made or have to be made. You're absolutely correct that fans don't know exactly what's going on, but that is by design, and in many ways it's just the nature of the beast. Some things we can't know. That being said, the professionals screw the hell up all the time. The professionals disagree all the time. These disagreements can be within the same franchise or from franchise to franchise. And sometimes these decisions are all over the place, so excuse me if I ain't exactly buying the I-know-more-than-thee sentiment and that that means that professionals always make better decisions than fans would about certain players. Some of this stuff is simply luck or a crapshoot.
×
×
  • Create New...