Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norris predicting Panthers trade up with Lions

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

We would be crazy to trade up unless it for one of top 2 OTs in the draft and Dillard isn't that guy. There will be plenty of OTs at 16. Hurney isn't going to panic. He has learned his lesson. Plus last draft we did well not reaching for players or giving away high draft picks. Look what Matso did with Norwell and he was undrafted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCO96 Veteran

SCO96

Posted
Posted
Just now, panthers55 said:

We would be crazy to trade up unless it for one of top 2 OTs in the draft and Dillard isn't that guy. There will be plenty of OTs at 16. Hurney isn't going to panic. He has learned his lesson. Plus last draft we did well not reaching for players or giving away high draft picks. Look what Matso did with Norwell and he was undrafted. 

There may be plenty of OT's available at 16, but are they capable of playing at solid level at the LT position in the NFL? With the exception of Michael Oher's 2015 season, our LT situation has been a mess since Jordan Gross retired after the 2103 season.

I'm not saying I'd make this move. I don't know a lot about this year's class of LT's. BUT, if Dillard came in and solidified the LT position for the next 5-7 years I don't see how anyone could look back on this move and say we gave up too much to move up. I'm guessing we have to give up a 1 and 3. That would still leave us with selections in the 2nd and 3rd rounds to address the DL and Safety positions.

If they could make a move like this and give up a 4th and a later round pick instead of a 3rd, I'd go for it, even though I'd be inclined to take a DL for the pass rush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

There may be plenty of OT's available at 16, but are they capable of playing at solid level at the LT position in the NFL? With the exception of Michael Oher's 2015 season, our LT situation has been a mess since Jordan Gross retired after the 2103 season.

I'm not saying I'd make this move. I don't know a lot about this year's class of LT's. BUT, if Dillard came in and solidified the LT position for the next 5-7 years I don't see how anyone could look back on this move and say we gave up too much to move up. I'm guessing we have to give up a 1 and 3. That would still leave us with selections in the 2nd and 3rd rounds to address the DL and Safety positions.

If they could make a move like this and give up a 4th and a later round pick instead of a 3rd, I'd go for it, even though I'd be inclined to take a DL for the pass rush.

The point is that Dillard isn't considered by many to be a top 3 OT. He is good in the passing game but middling in the run game. No explosion off the ball and lacks strength. That means he isn't a plug and play guy and will need work. There are other guys out there who are just as good who will be there at 16. And better guys at other positions relative to their peers. That is the point. When you reach for one guy you better hope he is everything you are looking for because you mortgaged some of your future to get him. Dillard may be a stud but isn't worth moving up for IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCO96 Veteran

SCO96

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

The point is that Dillard isn't considered by many to be a top 3 OT. He is good in the passing game but middling in the run game. No explosion off the ball and lacks strength. That means he isn't a plug and play guy and will need work. There are other guys out there who are just as good who will be there at 16. And better guys at other positions relative to their peers. That is the point. When you reach for one guy you better hope he is everything you are looking for because you mortgaged some of your future to get him. Dillard may be a stud but isn't worth moving up for IMO. 

As I said earlier, I haven't followed the O-lineman as closely as some of the other positions because I was assuming (perhaps wrongly) that the Panthers would be looking for a d-lineman in the 1st round. I need you to enlighten me.

Who are the top 3 rated OL in this years draft?

Which lineman do you think will be available at 16 who are as good as better than Dillard?

You spoke highly of his pass blocking, which is what we desperately need. Is his run blocking better than Kalil and Clark? I don't think the two guys I mentioned are highly rated players, yet CMac was still able to rush for 1,000 yds this season. Do you think time he'd spend with Matsko before the season would be enough time to improve the run blocking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SCO96 said:

As I said earlier, I haven't followed the O-lineman as closely as some of the other positions because I was assuming (perhaps wrongly) that the Panthers would be looking for a d-lineman in the 1st round. I need you to enlighten me.

Who are the top 3 rated OL in this years draft?

Which lineman do you think will be available at 16 who are as good as better than Dillard?

You spoke highly of his pass blocking, which is what we desperately need. Is his run blocking better than Kalil and Clark? I don't think the two guys I mentioned are highly rated players, yet CMac was still able to rush for 1,000 yds this season. Do you think time he'd spend with Matsko before the season would be enough time to improve the run blocking?

Good questions. I am far from an expert on the draft and largely read what others have written who purport to be experts. But if we pick Dillard at 16 I wouldn't be unhappy knowing that Matso is one of the best. My concern is trading draft picks to move up. Especially where we aren't one player away from contending and for this year we hopefully have our starters. If Dillard isn't plug and play then is he so much better than anyone else who we could pick and develop like we did with Turner and Williams who were not top picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • fieryprophet
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By fieryprophet · Posted

      No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • strato
      Bryce's Achilles Heel Is Not What You Think It Is

      By strato · Posted

      Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...