Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns is way too small to be effectiveeeee.....!!!!!!!


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm a guy who worries about being told a player "doesn't respond to yelling".

After hearing that, I wouldn't have touched sweat with a ten-foot pole.

Agree 100% -  that dude is a walking red flag. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Michaelinraleigh said:

Unless we go full time 3-4 which we are still I'll suited for he was a bad pick at 16.

He has zero technique. Von was still a technician in college.

I'm so depressed I'm sitting in grey sweat pants.imageproxy.php?img=&key=7e7e9fcd50b54ebe

From the clips I've seen, he's got plenty of technique.

Watched him using stop-and-go moves to make opposing blockers hesitate, varying his speed to lull them, and as much as a spin move might give me flashbacks at least he does it the right way.

2 minutes ago, Michaelinraleigh said:

There are lots of guys like that.

Same with any business. 

Some people respond to love, some to praise, some to yelling, some to reason.

That's all it means. The days of grabbing guys by the face mask and spitting in their face are gone.

A good coach inspires and teaches each player with an individual approach.

An adult who's being paid a million dollars to play professional football doesn't need to be coddled like a sensitive third grader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm a guy who worries about being told a player "doesn't respond to yelling".

After hearing that, I wouldn't have touched sweat with a ten-foot pole.

Actually meant to bring that up. If it's true at all I'm totally with you. I hate assholes. I would hope he'd have grown out of his childish ways but if he hasn't I have no use for him either. Now let me go do a line with LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Michaelinraleigh said:

Stop and go? 

Look man that running around and dodging people is ok in College but not in the NFL. 

Especially against the run.

If I was an opposing OC I run over this guy for 6 yards a carry and we never get to pass rush. 

You can't run around a run block. The blocker will just squat on you and the back will cut off his ass. You have to fight across the face of a run blocker and this twig can't do it. I haven't seen one clip of him with a great jab step/punch and fighting across the face.

 

He's a liability. 

God I hope I'm wrong but I think he'll be worse than Jason Peter's and Everette Brown.

Wow bro. That only hurt a lot. Please don't do that again. It's just not comfortable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 adult who's being paid a million dollars to play professional football doesn't need to be coddled like a sensitive third grader.

An adult shouldn't have to resort to yelling to get their point across. I don't care how much money you pay me or the role I'm asked to take on, I'm not going to resort to yelling and I'm not going to put up with it for long myself, culture be damned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brown was a mid 2nd round pick and a lot of people forget this.  It is pretty obvious that the Panthers are trying to get faster on defense to match up better against the Saints and Falcons and the Burns pick seems logical.  RR knows defense and the Panthers apparently really liked this kid.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But is burns really reliable as an OLB as well? How's this 3-4 going to look?

                                                                       SS                                                 FS

                                   OLB                                 ILB                                      ILB                              OLB

CB                                 DE                                                   NT                                    DE                                 CB

What do you guys have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Turnip said:

But is burns really reliable as an OLB as well? How's this 3-4 going to look?

                                                                       SS                                                 FS

                                   OLB                                 ILB                                      ILB                              OLB

CB                                 DE                                                   NT                                    DE                                 CB

What do you guys have?

Do what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fox007 said:

They are probably influenced by Mario Addison of all people. He came into the league UDFA even smaller than Burns but Burns has first round talent to go with it. Seems the team is keeping it somewhat tight on the 3-4/4-3 and I don't imagine we will convert to always using the 3-4. In terms of 4-3 alignments we used to move Hardy into the middle to bring in smaller but faster edge rushers and if it is a clear pass rushing down/distance it won't matter what his size is he'll be there to get around the edge quickly while KK has the middle being pressured.

(theoretically ofc)

Yep, you have good examples like Addison.  But Addison only gained about 10 lbs (he was listed around 250 at Troy and the official Panther's roster has him at 260 now).  And Addison is also two inches shorter than Burns, so he had less work to do to add to his center of mass/gravity than Burns will at 6-5.

Then you have  counter-examples of highly-rated "undersized" prospects like Vic Beasley and Takkarist McKinley for Atlanta who can't seem to get more than 5 or 6 sacks in a season (the exception being the 2016 season for Beasley when Atlanta used him as more of a tradition 3-4 OLB rusher and he got 15 sacks).

I mean, yeah, experimenting and hoping and praying is a rush and all, but I'd always prefer the player that actually FITS the role when he walks into the door over the "project", every damn time.  It'll be AWESOME if Burns puts on enough weight.  It'll be AWESOME if Burns doesn't lose any speed doing it.  It'll be AWESOME if Burns maintains his quick twitch at a bigger size.  A lot of "ifs" there... will they all come true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Michaelinraleigh said:

Von was still a technician in college.

Von also has two inches less height at approximately the same weight, which places his center of mass/gravity lower in his body, which is valuable as a pass rusher, provides more power to pretty much every pass rush technique.  A higher center of mass/gravity allows the OL/OT to get the pass rusher off balance much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow, didn't catch that!  I don't think Chuba's a power back either but he's usually good at getting that 1 or 2 yards. That was an uncharacteristic day for him.
    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30   Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
×
×
  • Create New...