Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MMQB Top 10 MLB List


CanadianCat

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Toomers said:

  I can speak to post-1975. 

   Lambert, Carson, Urlacher, Singletary, and Willis are all worthy of top 5 consideration. But I feel Luke has already surpassed them. None were the complete package Luke is. Only Lewis was, And the only way to catch him is longevity. I think both are the best MLBs I’ve ever seen. 

  

Man Willis was a monster. He would be rivaling Luke right now had he kept playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Toomers said:

Willis made 5 All-Pro Teams and one 2nd team. 

Beason made one 1st and one 2nd team thru the same time period. Beason had basically a 4 year career. 

 Willis played eight and made the pro bowl every year but his last. 

  That’s not a small difference. 

ok so maybe I was too biased in my assessment! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if you can compare Luke to LT. LT only had nine Int’s his whole career vs the 16 Luke already has. Seems they aren’t used the same way, LT was more of a rushing LB while Luke stays back more.

Lewis is of course top 3, with Urlacher, Butkus, Singletary and Willis in the conversation. 

I don’t think any of these guys were known for calling out the oppositions plays like Luke does, that in itself makes him top 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CanadianCat said:

ok so maybe I was too biased in my assessment! 

Hard not to. If I wasn’t a Cam-wagon fan(established 2011...lol)  I’m sure I would have a slightly different view. I never got to see the real Beason for entire games as he wasn’t the same by then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toomers said:

Hard not to. If I wasn’t a Cam-wagon fan(established 2011...lol)  I’m sure I would have a slightly different view. I never got to see the real Beason for entire games as he wasn’t the same by then. 

I started watching NFL in 2004 (missed the SB run) but man this franchise has been good at finding LB's. Going from Morgan to Beason to Luke. Cannot get any better than that. 

Beason IMO was a real special player but injuries caught up to him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/27/2019 at 3:03 PM, SmokinwithWilly said:

For me it's like comparing Manning to Brady with Keuchly and Lewis. Manning was by far the most cerebral QB to ever put on a helmet, but Brady is more over the top talent wise and physically. Both are easily in contention as top 5 QB of all time, but Brady has more rings. With BB as head coach, I think it's possible PM could have had 7 or 8 rings. I think Lewis had more physical ability in his time, but Luke makes up for what he lacks by comparison, with his ability visual gifts of play diagnosis. Either way, if he can play a full career, Luke could easily be in the top 5 MLB of all time conversation. 

Manning played with Reggie Wayne, the Edge, Marvin Harrison, Jeff Saturday, and they had Mathis and quite a few other possible great players on the defensive side. Tom Brady has played with one sure Hall of Famer and one possible, Moss and Gronk.

To say Manning could've done more with the Patriots than Brady has done is a stretch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

Manning played with Reggie Wayne, the Edge, Marvin Harrison, Jeff Saturday, and they had Mathis and quite a few other possible great players on the defensive side. Tom Brady has played with one sure Hall of Famer and one possible, Moss and Gronk.

To say Manning could've done more with the Patriots than Brady has done is a stretch. 

I didnt say with the Pats. I said with BB as HC. With the weapons he had in Indy, I could easily see 7 or 8 rings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I didnt say with the Pats. I said with BB as HC. With the weapons he had in Indy, I could easily see 7 or 8 rings. 

If he couldn't win with that talent and the coaching he had in Indy, Billy Boy wouldn't have made that big of a difference. Nevermind the fact that you have Kraft who basically handed Bill the reigns to all team operations matters and he may not have had that freedom in Indy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only ILB I have above Luke is Ray Lewis. 

Career longevity and persona probably means Luke doesn't jump him but #2 all time wouldn't be bad slot.  But in terms of pure play at ILB? Hard to say anyone has done that better. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Try reading the Huddle. It's pretty much the only topic. 
    • Man.... you all have been ruined by Rhule and Fitt.  Take a moment to look back at areas where we improved and try to grasp on a glimmer of hope and optimism....   Week 1: Sept. 8 at New Orleans  (L) 0-1 I think, all things being equal, we split our divisional opponents.  The Saints are not scary, are not coached well, and are going to get old all at once.  However, being in the Superdome for the first game of the year I lean in to homefield advantage causing us to have a few careless mistakes at the wrong time.  Close game, 27-24 Saints  Week 2: Sept 15 vs. Los Angeles Chargers (W) 1-1 The Chargers have lots of work to do.  This game comes down to one main factor; can we stop the run.  I think our defense, at least at the beginning of the season will be firing on all cylinders.  Close game again, but this time we get the W 24 - 18 Panthers Week 3: Sept 22 at Las Vegas  (W) 2-1 I am a HUGE Gardner Minshew fan, but I don't believe the Raiders are much better than we are.  So long as we don't get beat up by their tight ends all game, I think we should be the better team if we pound the rock.  W - 24-21 Panthers Week 4: Sept. 29 vs. Cincinnati  (L) 2-2 This is going to be a reality check.  We feel good being over .500 for the first time since I can remember.  They are just better.  L - 31-21 Bengals Week 5: Oct. 6 at Chicago (W) 3-2 This is a PRIDE game.  We want it more. W - 24 - 15 Panthers Week 6: Oct. 13 vs. Atlanta (W) 4- 2 This is our turn to get a home W in our division.  Flacons are either going to be pretty good, or a huge bust.  Either way I think they will be susceptible for an upset here and there.  We weren't too far off from beating them last year.   W 27 - 24 Panthers Week 7: Oct. 20 at Washington  (W) 5 - 2  Their defense is good, Offense is a work in progress.... Sound familiar?  This will be bowling shoe ugly but I think we run it better than they do.  W 17 - 12 Panthers Week 8: Oct. 27 at Denver (L) 5-3 If this was at home I would choose us, but I don't see us winning at Mile High.  I will stick with the copy and past analysis on this one.  LSS - we cannot escape our cure of Sean Peyton. L 24 - 18 Broncos Week 9: Nov. 3 vs. New Orleans (W) 6 - 3 Home game, bad team, we win.  W - 27 - 24 Panthers Week 10: Nov. 10 vs. N.Y. Giants (Munich, Germany) (W) 7 - 3 The Giants have an improved pass rush and a rookie WR.  That is their strength.  I think we will be better prepared.  W - Panthers 27 - 21 Week 11: Nov. 17 BYE Week 12: Nov. 24 vs. Kansas City (L) 7 - 4 We'll get crushed, and hit the downward trajectory of our season starting now....  L Chiefs - 34 - 21 Week 13: Dec. 1 vs. Tampa Bay (L) 7 - 5 We are licking our wounds from the KC game and it shows up in the box score.  L - Bucs 24 - 15 Week 14: Dec 8 at Philadelphia (L) 7- 6 I think we give them a game, but come up short in the end.  L - Eagles 32 - 24 Week 15: Dec: 15 vs. Dallas (L) 7 - 7 I want to pick an upset here.  No Dan Quinn, Lots of pressure for Dallas, they have been really healthy for a long time.  But common sense prevails, they are better.  L - Cowboys 24 - 21 Week 16: Dec. 22 vs. Arizona (W) 8 - 7 Get right game, but a tough one.  We need this one to calm the huddle down.  W - Panthers 28 - 24 Week 17: Dec. 29 at Tampa Bay (W) 9 - 7 TB is right where we are.  This is our 50/50 spilt  W - 22 - 25 Week 18: Jan. 4 or 5 at Atlanta (L) 9 - 8 Falcons win the division.  We show improvement from much better coaching and offensive line play.  The Huddle is calms down, but like always is not happy. Full League Prediction: Prepare the poop emojis!!!!!
    • The problem that Bryce faces is his lack of prototypical tools.  He's not the tall, strong armed mobile QB that tends to get drafted first overall.  His game is not played in underwear on a practice field.  His best asset are his intangibles.  They aren't sexy like a cannon arm or a fast 40 yard dash. OK, so we took the lesser athlete.  Bryce put up a pretty bad season with a bad team around him.  The coaching staff, for all it's platitudes, sucked.  They made sure Bryce could run a huddle, but didn't help him get better as a player.  Bad choice. Compare that to what other teams did to their Rookies:  they put them in position to succeed with better personnel and better play calling.  Sure, there are physical differences which are going to affect the outcomes, but you can't change it. Am I trying to ride to the defense of Bryce?  Only a little.  He's my favorite team's QB, and I believe in him.  Now, he's got this year to show that he's "the No. 1 for a reason" (Thanks CJ Stroud).  Will he, won't he?  I don't know at all.  That's on the D&D crew to put Bryce is position to play well.  Running the ball is going to make things a lot easier for Bryce.  Does that discount his success if he plays well?  For some of y'all it will.  Some of y'all just don't like Bryce, like he stole you DoorDash or something. Regardless, let's see what happens in 2024.  If Bryce stinks it up, then we're going back to the QB well again.  
×
×
  • Create New...