Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodell and refs to testify under oath about infamous no call


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

This definitely crazy. How many penalties in any game noticeable or unnoticabky can you call in any game? All cost a team a possession or potential points. Will everyone get a lawsuit cause every team has had non calls that could have won them the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Darvinsun said:

This definitely crazy. How many penalties in any game noticeable or unnoticabky can you call in any game? All cost a time a possession or potential points. Will everyone get a lawsuit cause every team has had non calls that could have won them the game.

Let's not forget about the NFL carrying their sorry asses to a Lombardi for that post-Katrina feel good story all the while those filthy swamp rats were putting bounties on opposing players while Sean Payton ate pain killers like Skittles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what are they going to say? "Sorry, refs are human, they make mistakes, part of the game. Can't do anything about it.." 

Which is, of course, basically the email they send out every Monday during the season to teams about blown calls.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

As awesome as it is to see Saints fans cry  I wish Jerry Richardson and Charlotte would have stood up for Cam the way the game was rigged in SB 50. That game was called much worse.

You have to understand whether or not you're going to be able to actually win or whether you're just going to end up looking like a whiny douchebag. You gotta have an absolute smoking gun to be able to prove ref manipulation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Considering you previously struggled to understand BTT despite it being explained in a video, write-up, and multiple replies, I get why this might be a little too complex for you. Happy to clarify again! Just let me know which part tripped you up this time. 😉
    • And, honestly, there's only so much you can attempt to do in the draft. And every draft pick is a roll of the dice. But that's where grabbing a ton of UDFAs, and targeting the best, makes a big difference. Sure, their individual chances of getting a hit here is less, but that shotgun pattern might just hit something.  Right now, we need bulk, partly to rebuild and partly to dilute the deep level of stank that has developed on this team in the last six years. If we're going to rebuild a culture built around culture, accountability and winning, then these UDFAs we bring in each season have to be the wash water that gets out that leftover dirt.  Canales seems to be a smart, culture-first, build up the good ones kind of guy. I like that and I hope he can keep it going here. But he was working against a locker room that had been taught to lose and taught to distrust or ignore coaches. He's got his work cut out for him, still. He does seem to have it moving in the right direction and that's something I was pretty amazed with by the end of last season.  
    • The most telling sign, IMO, of a team on the upward swing is who we lost in the off-season. Who left that even saw the field? Woods, Clowney, Sanders, & Hekker. OK...no big deal. Clowney is the only 1 that I raised an eyebrow over and I get that it was a money decision. No need to pay him over $7M to take snaps from our draft picks when he was just OK last year.
×
×
  • Create New...