Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive line played well? Nextgen stats argues they were really bad.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Well, in another thread I was complaining about how conservative Norv's gameplan was against the Rams. Often times, deep passes were towards the end of Cam's defined progression on most plays. Very few times was Cam's read supposed to be deep.

But now, looking at this stat, it's fair to see why.

https://twitter.com/bobbyrosinski/status/1171945668979679232?s=21

"Interesting NFL Next Gen Stat from the loss vs the Rams.  #Panthers OL sustained blocks for 2.5 seconds just 17% of the time. That is the 2nd worst by any team in a game since start of last season. Cam average pass came 2.2 seconds after the snap, his fastest in the last 4 years!"

Sounds like a lot of what could've been a nightmare was masked with Cam's change in throw pace, largely dictated by Norv's design. This can help explain why his gameplan was so conservative, perhaps stemming from little trust in the Panthers O-line against the Rams D. Which is fair.

Hopefully this is an anomaly and not the norm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Well, in another thread I was complaining about how conservative Norv's gameplan was against the Rams. Often times, deep passes were towards the end of Cam's defined progression on most plays. Very few times was Cam's read supposed to be deep.

But now, looking at this stat, it's fair to see why.

https://twitter.com/bobbyrosinski/status/1171945668979679232?s=21

"Interesting NFL Next Gen Stat from the loss vs the Rams.  #Panthers OL sustained blocks for 2.5 seconds just 17% of the time. That is the 2nd worst by any team in a game since start of last season. Cam average pass came 2.2 seconds after the snap, his fastest in the last 4 years!"

Sounds like a lot of what could've been a nightmare was masked with Cam's change in throw pace, largely dictated by Norv's design. This can help explain why his gameplan was so conservative, perhaps stemming from little trust in the Panthers O-line against the Rams D. Which is fair.

Hopefully this is an anomaly and not the norm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I would like to see some things change that could help the OL---if we were on the LOS sooner, they could alter the cadence and detect blitz giveaways.  The when you are snapping the ball on a hand clap at 1 second on the play clock, the DL tend to tee off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't give a lot of weight to these kinds of stats because they don't tell the whole story.

FWIW I think it was all a part of the game plan. I think we were, rightfully so, afraid of Donald and their LBs, and we intended to have a quick pass/short game with them and work their middle rather than their front. We got jittery pretty quick out of the gate with the Matthews sack, and I think it went somewhat downhill from there.

Was it successful? We lost, but we neutralized Donald and CMC ate. Maybe those are some small victories? All that matters, in the end, is the W or the L.

The bottom line is that we didn't do enough. I expect that to change tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bronn said:

I don't give a lot of weight to these kinds of stats because they don't tell the whole story.

FWIW I think it was all a part of the game plan. I think we were, rightfully so, afraid of Donald and their LBs, and we intended to have a quick pass/short game with them and work their middle rather than their front. We got jittery pretty quick out of the gate with the Matthews sack, and I think it went somewhat downhill from there.

Was it successful? We lost, but we neutralized Donald and CMC ate. Maybe those are some small victories? All that matters, in the end, is the W or the L.

The bottom line is that we didn't do enough. I expect that to change tonight.

Yeah, Tampas D is not the Rams D.  I expect Norv to open the playbook a little more tonight and really attempt to put it on the Bucs from the first whistle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think you can evaluate an OL by how long they stay on blocks.  Here is why:  If the QB gets the ball out in 2 seconds, they disengage.  If the play is a screen pass, they disengage.   If they are ripping across the face and blocking on the second level--how do you measure that?  In turn, a player like Star was great for occupying 2 OL for 3-4 seconds, keeping them off Luke and leaving KK in great shape. Those linemen stayed on the bronco for 4 seconds but were ineffective.

In other words, sometimes you chip and release--sometimes you pull---etc.  Dumb stat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Well, in another thread I was complaining about how conservative Norv's gameplan was against the Rams. Often times, deep passes were towards the end of Cam's defined progression on most plays. Very few times was Cam's read supposed to be deep.

But now, looking at this stat, it's fair to see why.

https://twitter.com/bobbyrosinski/status/1171945668979679232?s=21

"Interesting NFL Next Gen Stat from the loss vs the Rams.  #Panthers OL sustained blocks for 2.5 seconds just 17% of the time. That is the 2nd worst by any team in a game since start of last season. Cam average pass came 2.2 seconds after the snap, his fastest in the last 4 years!"

Sounds like a lot of what could've been a nightmare was masked with Cam's change in throw pace, largely dictated by Norv's design. This can help explain why his gameplan was so conservative, perhaps stemming from little trust in the Panthers O-line against the Rams D. Which is fair.

Hopefully this is an anomaly and not the norm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Most of Tom Brady's career has been passes with the ball out in under 3 seconds.  It's not a bad thing.  The difference between us and them is that they are hitting the receivers in stride, and the scheme is designed in such a way that leaves the receivers wide open.  

Combination of bad passing and lack of creativity in the route designs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do hate the Patriots so much, but damn they are good!  He does hit them in stride and not only that, they know where the damn first down marker is and the receivers make sure they are at or beyond it, thus they usually always move the chains.  But back to the O-line, I believe Brady has good trust in his O-line and feels more comfortable than Cam does.  Cam sometimes appears like he has the jitters  and anticipating a hit any moment, lack of trust perhaps?  That can mess with you mentally affecting your performance.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Wolfpack352 said:

I do hate the Patriots so much, but damn they are good!  He does hit them in stride and not only that, they know where the damn first down marker is and the receivers make sure they are at or beyond it, thus they usually always move the chains.  But back to the O-line, I believe Brady has good trust in his O-line and feels more comfortable than Cam does.  Cam sometimes appears like he has the jitters  and anticipating a hit any moment, lack of trust perhaps?  That can mess with you mentally affecting your performance.  

Yeah, but Brady is one of the most accurate QBs of all time.  It really does make me jealous to see guys like Brady and Brees hit their receiver in the chest and in stride no matter where they are throwing it.  Nearly every single pass is on the money from those guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

Yeah, but Brady is one of the most accurate QBs of all time.  It really does make me jealous to see guys like Brady and Brees hit their receiver in the chest and in stride no matter where they are throwing it.  Nearly every single pass is on the money from those guys.

It’s why they are the very best to do it.

Cam is a good not great passer. But when he’s on, he’s really fuging on. I said before the rams game I wanted to see Cam more as a game manager with quick passes until we see what this oline is like and to see them gel. Bucs dline is considerably less talented. So I’d like for Norv to open it up a bit and see how this o line can do. Bring back those seam routes Cam is money on. Play action for deep routes. 

If we just do the dink and dunk tonight I’m gonna be very worried going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still cannot understand why we don't roll out, bootleg, screen more, and run some 21 and 22 personnel to allow for more time. Maybe, Cam is not accurate on the move, that is the only reason I can think as to why we don't bootleg. Hell, Atlanta and Michael Vick made a living torching teams with bootlegs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...