Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

James Bradberry: Playing at a high-level.


ellis

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ellis said:

He’s not getting a lot of targets. But when he does, he’s maximizing every snap. That’s what I am impressed by the most. Now that Jackson’s put up some good tape, opponents have to reconsider their options a bit. 

I expect numerous double moves from Fuller come Sunday. I bet they try and recreate the blown coverage where Donte bit and tried to jump the route leaving the guy wide open down the sideline only to drop it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s true, double move is a good idea. The problem with that, from Houston’s perspective, is they’re allowing pressure on nearly 40% of all pass plays. That’s the worst in the league. I’m sure O’Brien will scheme up, because that’s what he learned how to do under BB. Where they seem to be weakest is on the interior, which could mean a big day if 93 and 99 are in there together. No Lamar Miller, which has hurt their screen game and pass pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Sometimes I get confused as to what site I’m on

It’s my Twitter.  My site: No ads. No subscriptions. I’m just here sharing information.  I’m not driving for subscribers, or profit, or even followers.

But if it bothers people, I won’t do it. 

Just trying to help drive the conversations along for this place. Again, no big deal. I can stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ellis said:

It’s a free site. No ads. No subscriptions. I’m just here sharing information. But if it bothers people, I won’t do it.

Lots of people on here don’t like any positive coverage of the team so they can stay inside their bubble and talk about how we’re the worst team in the NFL.

The rest of us appreciate what you do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we’re at it, I wanna personally thank Jeremy for giving me an opportunity to share some free content with you guys. I haven’t met the guy, and I don’t know him personally, but this is a great place and he’s done a tremendous job over the years. Props.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bradberry is as solid and consistent as they come. He's not going to make many spectacular plays but he's not going to make many spectacularly awful plays either. He just quietly does his job. Dante is the polar opposite on the other side. He's going to make a lot of splash plays, but he's a riverboat gambler at CB and he's going to get burned badly occasionally because of it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...