Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cold Hard Facts : Ron and Norv since 2018 are 10-3 When Going Into a Game With a Healthy QB

Pantha-kun

By Pantha-kun,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Pantha-kun Mentor

Pantha-kun

Posted
Posted
  • 6-2 first half of 2018 with a HEALTHY Cam (before TJ Watt Hit if you want to use that as the flashpoint where Cam wasn't the same afterwards) 
  • 0-6 after that with an INJURED Cam
  • 0-1 with a HEALTHY HEINEKE/ALLEN (they were healthy when the game started)
  • 1-0 with a HEALTHY ALLEN (healthy when the game started)    
  • 0-2 2019 with INJURED Cam
  • 3-0 2019 with HEALTHY ALLEN

Do the math, this means Ron/Norv are  10-3 when going into a game with a healthy Quarterback , and he's 0-8 going into games with an injured QB.

I'm pretty sure his system is working and translating to wins when there's a healthy QB to mostly be a game manager and hit key throws, and CMC to run it down the other teams gullet. That's my point. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pantha-kun Mentor

Pantha-kun

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The key stats are 0-8 with with injured Cam.. he HAS to be absolutely 100% before he steps on the field again. Because these wins stacking up in his absence are piling on evidence that we were losing primarily b/c Cam trying to play through injury.

Norv's system fails massively when you have a QB that cant make key throws. In his system the QB doesnt have to make ALL the throws but the key throws are needed to win.

All the QB really needs to do is be a game manager who can make a few timely passes and not throw picks. B/C our Defense and running game are good enough otherwise that we dont need the QB to be otherworldly to win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

All the QB really needs to do is be a game manager who can make a few timely passes and not throw picks. B/C our Defense and running game are good enough otherwise that we dont need the QB to be otherworldly to win. 

Sounds suspiciously like the 2015 Broncos . . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBiii Newbie

SBiii

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, MVPccaffrey said:

And we're winning now with a game manager. 

***On 10/2/2019 at 12:17 AM, 332nd said:

"Game manager" is a QB who has a few games a season where they light it up, but for most games they just don't turn the ball over, have rather pedestrian stats, but they keep the defense off balance enough that they usually come out with a win. 

Basically they don't carry the team, they just make sure everyone does their job.***

----------------------------------------

Another guy provided that as the proper definition of a "game manager".

Sounds like they "light it up" 3 to 5 times per year and come out with the win....let's call it 4 wins while "lighting it up".

Then they "usually come out with the win" in the other 12 games...."usually" implies a lot more than 50% but in order to be conservative let's call it 7 wins with "no turnovers, pedestrian stats, keeping the D off balance", etc....

....adds up to 11-5.

That sounds fantastic....implies playoffs just about every year, let's call it 6-of-7 years....

....sign me up for that --- folks I know who are Seahawks fans tell me it's a terrific state of being!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SBiii said:

 

....adds up to 11-5.

That sounds fantastic....implies playoffs just about every year, let's call it 6-of-7 years....

....sign me up for that --- folks I know who are Seahawks fans tell me it's a terrific state of being!

 

I too would like to sign up for 11-5 every year.  That's entering elite territory tbh.  Maybe you slide to 9-7 on a bad year, maybe you go 13-3 in a good year.  This sounds like a team that could really keep a fan base engaged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mc52beast Grand Master

mc52beast

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SBiii said:

***On 10/2/2019 at 12:17 AM, 332nd said:

"Game manager" is a QB who has a few games a season where they light it up, but for most games they just don't turn the ball over, have rather pedestrian stats, but they keep the defense off balance enough that they usually come out with a win. 

Basically they don't carry the team, they just make sure everyone does their job.***

----------------------------------------

Another guy provided that as the proper definition of a "game manager".

Sounds like they "light it up" 3 to 5 times per year and come out with the win....let's call it 4 wins while "lighting it up".

Then they "usually come out with the win" in the other 12 games...."usually" implies a lot more than 50% but in order to be conservative let's call it 7 wins with "no turnovers, pedestrian stats, keeping the D off balance", etc....

....adds up to 11-5.

That sounds fantastic....implies playoffs just about every year, let's call it 6-of-7 years....

....sign me up for that --- folks I know who are Seahawks fans tell me it's a terrific state of being!

 

Is Allen good enough to do anything in the playoffs against the best defenses in the League? He’s definitely not Russell Wilson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBiii Newbie

SBiii

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BrianS said:

I too would like to sign up for 11-5 every year.  That's entering elite territory tbh.  Maybe you slide to 9-7 on a bad year, maybe you go 13-3 in a good year.  This sounds like a team that could really keep a fan base engaged.

What you describe is exactly what Russ Wilson has produced since being picked in the 3rd round of the 2012 NFL draft.  Russ wasn't blessed with excessive size, or strength....can't overpower anyone....

....but he can damn sure manage a football game.

(PS...NOT putting Kyle in Russ's category...Kyle has a long way to go but I think his ceiling is high.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...