Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Allens film study (it's not good)


KaseKlosed

Recommended Posts

The guy is what 23? We are extremely fortunate to have him. He has the talent and will get better with experience. I have said it a million times, we have a ton of talent on both sides of the ball, and I am glad Allen has lead the team while Cam has been recovering, but THIS YEAR we need Cam back and to have his foot healed so we can compete for a championship should we make the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarPanthers89 said:

The guy is what 23? We are extremely fortunate to have him. He has the talent and will get better with experience. I have said it a million times, we have a ton of talent on both sides of the ball, and I am glad Allen has lead the team while Cam has been recovering, but THIS YEAR we need Cam back and to have his foot healed so we can compete for a championship should we make the playoffs. 

This is the best team talent wise we have EVER assembled. What a damn shame it would be if we weren’t able to see it through with a healthy Cam 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like this PanthersFilmGuy he is brutally honest and has no bias or agendas. If he would just take the time to review every play and break them down rather than a measly 6 plays he would make his points even stronger. How long has he been doing this? Two, maybe three weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

I really like this PanthersFilmGuy he is brutally honest and has no bias or agendas. If he would just take the time to review every play and break them down rather than a measly 6 plays he would make his points even stronger. How long has he been doing this? Two, maybe three weeks?

Sacca twitter alt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, t96 said:

It’s unfathomable that this fool still can’t admit that McC is an elite RB and not just a slot WR like he’s convinced is the case.

You must have missed my recent posts on CMC. I ate my crow. I need you to let it go as well. CMC just does not have the power Kamara or Barkley or Bell has. He is the best weapon we have. Thank you for your on going concern. Have a great day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...