Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Allens film study (it's not good)

KaseKlosed

By KaseKlosed,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
Posted

The guy is what 23? We are extremely fortunate to have him. He has the talent and will get better with experience. I have said it a million times, we have a ton of talent on both sides of the ball, and I am glad Allen has lead the team while Cam has been recovering, but THIS YEAR we need Cam back and to have his foot healed so we can compete for a championship should we make the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
Just now, WarPanthers89 said:

The guy is what 23? We are extremely fortunate to have him. He has the talent and will get better with experience. I have said it a million times, we have a ton of talent on both sides of the ball, and I am glad Allen has lead the team while Cam has been recovering, but THIS YEAR we need Cam back and to have his foot healed so we can compete for a championship should we make the playoffs. 

This is the best team talent wise we have EVER assembled. What a damn shame it would be if we weren’t able to see it through with a healthy Cam 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

I really like this PanthersFilmGuy he is brutally honest and has no bias or agendas. If he would just take the time to review every play and break them down rather than a measly 6 plays he would make his points even stronger. How long has he been doing this? Two, maybe three weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weyco2000 Mentor

weyco2000

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

I really like this PanthersFilmGuy he is brutally honest and has no bias or agendas. If he would just take the time to review every play and break them down rather than a measly 6 plays he would make his points even stronger. How long has he been doing this? Two, maybe three weeks?

Sacca twitter alt

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaseKlosed Collaborator

KaseKlosed

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 minutes ago, t96 said:

It’s unfathomable that this fool still can’t admit that McC is an elite RB and not just a slot WR like he’s convinced is the case.

You must have missed my recent posts on CMC. I ate my crow. I need you to let it go as well. CMC just does not have the power Kamara or Barkley or Bell has. He is the best weapon we have. Thank you for your on going concern. Have a great day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...