Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam and Kia have another kid


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

Girlfriend is the default, because what do you go with past that?  It just gets ugly.  Better to put girlfriend and let people find out on their own what the current situation/drama is.

 

They have kids, they always going to be attached, and girlfriend is the ground floor relationship status.  Would you have rather it said Cam Newton's baby mama?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlazeCarolina said:

Girlfriend is the default, because what do you go with past that?  It just gets ugly.  Better to put girlfriend and let people find out on their own what the current situation/drama is.

 

They have kids, they always going to be attached, and girlfriend is the ground floor relationship status.  Would you have rather it said Cam Newton's baby mama?

Well it didn’t have to specify anything. “Cam Newton and Kia Proctor have fourth child. They have three other children...yaddayaddayadda”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pleeeease don't turn this thread into another Cam vs. Kyle or bad jokes about Cam's wardrobe or his play or even worse some morality tale about why they aren't married. The article on facebook had some of the most cringeworthy poo related to that. Do better Huddle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Well it didn’t have to specify anything. “Cam Newton and Kia Proctor have fourth child. They have three other children...yaddayaddayadda”

We have to pretend we live in a  world where this doesn't happen.  You forgot that part.

People still exist like my grandmother who think people shouldn't live together or share a bad if they are not married.  It would have been funny and probably got more clicks if they said " friends with benefits ".  That would have got people going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlazeCarolina said:

We have to pretend we live in a  world where this doesn't happen.  You forgot that part.

People still exist like my grandmother who think people shouldn't live together or share a bad if they are not married.  It would have been funny and probably got more clicks if they said " friends with benefits ".  That would have got people going.

Hah that woulda been awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Pleeeease don't turn this thread into another Cam vs. Kyle or bad jokes about Cam's wardrobe or his play or even worse some morality tale about why they aren't married. The article on facebook had some of the most cringeworthy poo related to that. Do better Huddle!

are you new GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Pleeeease don't turn this thread into another Cam vs. Kyle or bad jokes about Cam's wardrobe or his play or even worse some morality tale about why they aren't married. The article on facebook had some of the most cringeworthy poo related to that. Do better Huddle!

what is facebook and why do you know what is on there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...