Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Deadline News


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

I’m sure some teams would be interested in McCoy, Irvin, Olsen, Bradberry and Shaq are both free agents to be. Anyone on 1 year deals. 
 

If your plan isn’t to bring both (JB and ST) back then I’m of the belief you should get something for them before you lose them and get nothing. 

Even if we lost them, we'd almost certainly be looking at a 3rd round comp pick so the trade would have to be for more than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I know this wouldn’t be popular in the slightest but if I’m Hurney and I know Cam isn’t coming back until after Green Bay at the earliest, I’d think long and hard about selling. We aren't beating GB without Cam. So at minimum we’re at 4 losses in an extremely competitive conference with some tough games remaining. 
 

Teams are giving up a lot these days. It’s something that should at the very least be discussed

We aren't beating GB with or without Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
×
×
  • Create New...