Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Deadline News


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

I’m sure some teams would be interested in McCoy, Irvin, Olsen, Bradberry and Shaq are both free agents to be. Anyone on 1 year deals. 
 

If your plan isn’t to bring both (JB and ST) back then I’m of the belief you should get something for them before you lose them and get nothing. 

Even if we lost them, we'd almost certainly be looking at a 3rd round comp pick so the trade would have to be for more than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I know this wouldn’t be popular in the slightest but if I’m Hurney and I know Cam isn’t coming back until after Green Bay at the earliest, I’d think long and hard about selling. We aren't beating GB without Cam. So at minimum we’re at 4 losses in an extremely competitive conference with some tough games remaining. 
 

Teams are giving up a lot these days. It’s something that should at the very least be discussed

We aren't beating GB with or without Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...