Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Rankings by EPA/play and Passing Grade


Varking

Recommended Posts

Any sane individual wouldn't compare a backup to a franchise QB. Playmakers at QB are rare but can carry an offense and are well worth the $. If you don't have one you need one.

Why all of a sudden is Curtis Samuel being called "garbage"!?! No Cam. Samuel is out running deep balls thrown his way. Remember Tedd Ginn? You need an NFL arm for such fast receivers.

This QB "controversy" is idiotic and isnt based on football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 

2 hours ago, GreensboroPirate said:

Kyle Allen is a bottom 3 qb in the NFL by every single metric I've seen on him

Can't find a single positive metric on Allen, either by conventional stats, or advanced stats

People will cite win-loss record as his only positive metric, but that's not a quarterback stat, it's a team stat

 

Hes not lighting it up but hes not bottom 3 in any of the traditional qb stats. Theres no need to invent numbers to try to make a point when anyone can see it's not true by simply looking at the stats. What do you gain with false statements?

Maybe true for Mayfield, Darnold, Goff, Rosen but not Kyle Allen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Hey look, he compares to every 1st round rookie or 2nd year player out there.... what gives?

Most rookie quarterbacks, even first round, even first overall, don't make it in this league. It's very difficult to find a quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...