Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

losing Cam for this season maybe a blessing in disguise.


Diehardpanther02

Recommended Posts

Maybe losing Cam wasn't such a bad thing. It allows our new owner to see the problem areas not masked by our pro bowl quarterback. Hopefully he comes back 100% but at least it exposes where we lack as an NFL Franchise. Coaching, personnel and everything. Where can we improve? 

Maybe it forces things that's not been a priority to the top of the list. Maybe we will find an oline for Cam and McCaffrey, and become the best possible rushing attack ever in the NFL?  Who knows? But I feel like this season has highlighted necessary changes that's been holding us back, and now a new very progressive owner witnessing it maybe this is it. When luck goes our way?

 

Either way I'm thankful I will get to watch. 

 

#keeppounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our run blocking has improved a good bit. CMC is running through some nice holes nearly every game at least a few times. Pass pro leaves a little to be desired, especially watching games yesterday and seeing QBs have more than 3 seconds to make a decision.

I think if anything, the issues get fixed and Cam comes back and we blow the league up, the issues don't get fixed, Cam comes back and does either well or just OK and people are torn on what to do on this board, or the issues get fixed under a new regime.

The second option is honestly most likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if all the losing seasons before this didn't convince the team they needed better coaching and to get a better line around Cam, this season isn't going to be the tipping point in going all in there.

and Cam getting injured this season puts his future here in question, which is rather upsetting, so I would say this is not a blessing in disguise in any sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

if all the losing seasons before this didn't convince the team they needed better coaching and to get a better line around Cam, this season isn't going to be the tipping point in going all in there.

and Cam getting injured this season puts his future here in question, which is rather upsetting, so I would say this is not a blessing in disguise in any sense.

To be fair, current ownership has only  directly experienced two of those seasons and it sounds like he's already tired of it.

Under Jerry Richardson, we could have gone on like this forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather have an owner who can evaluate the situation without something catastrophic happening. Cam didn't cover up anything he made up for it. You could still clearly see the issues the team has regardless of Cam and any half rate evaluator regardless of business venture can see these types of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m sure Tepper will find us a franchise level QB who is really good but somehow doesn’t cover up problem areas on the roster with their elite play. In fact I hope all our elite talent only does enough to fill their role so that way we know who the good players are and who the bad players are.

All elite players make other players look better. That’s the fuging point! In the salary cap era you can’t have quality talent at all positions so you build around the best players you have. That means making a system that works to the advantage of your players and uhhh covers up the weak points on the roster.... all offenses and defenses have weak points, it’s why you get great players to make it work despite the flaws! 

Cam being cam is a feature, not a flaw. We can get away with it so we can put more money to other places on the roster to make our plans work.

Sick of hearing this line of thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You guys are just going to have to accept the fact that Dan Morgan is a mid GM best case scenario currently. I used to have people get very belligerent over defending Scott Fitterer too. And that's not hyperbole. People used to go to bat for that guy like he was blood related. We have a truckload invested in the OL and what do we have to show for it? The whole unit is already banged up including one of our big signings. Even without all that the group has largely taken a step back from last year in pass protection. Then you get to the QB room and there's only two conclusions you can make about Dan Morgan. Either he deliberately ignored it two years in a row on his own accord or he took orders from Tepper to do so. Either scenario says he's not fit to be an NFL GM.
    • Frank, ceding control of the defense in no way verifies that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.    It certainly buttresses the idea that Canales would need permission to bench him but that is as far as you can take it.    After that it is pure speculation and it doesn’t make sense. 
    • Uhh, okay yes that happened. I didn’t like the pick either I am a 3rd or later RB guy. Always. Actually hated the CMC pick too. Hated the Stewart pick.  No one wants to talk about trading the #39 in that draft and what he did with that.  Got #52, #155, and the Rams 2025 2nd to boot.   The 52 and 155 plus our 142 5th rounder to go up for a Brooks Everyone wants to forget about the 2025 2nd for that Rams trade  which was used to move up for Scourton.  That Rams trade down was a great deal for us.     
×
×
  • Create New...