Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So you say we have a chance!


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Yes, I know.  Please suspend your negativity and crystal ball gloom and despair prophecies to consider the brighter side of life. There is a way to 10-6, and it is possible, if you break down each game.

Washington Redskins:  A home game vs. the 2-9 Skins.  We should win by 20. Next.

Atlanta Falcons: The Falcons always get off to a good start vs. us and win.  However, they are 3-9, proven to be beatable.   Despite the fact that it is the Falcons, can we not agree that beating a 3-9 team is within the realm of possibility?  If we lose this game, disregard the rest of this, obviously--but the schedule could be better than it appears.

Seattle Seahawks:  This will be the toughest game on the schedule, but we have some unique advantages.  First, the Seahawks play the Panthers in the midst of a division stretch that is preceded by the Rams and followed by the Cards and then the Niners for all the marbles.  Furthermore, the Seahawks will be playing at the Rams on the late Sunday night game (west coast) before traveling to the east coast to play Carolina.  The Seahawks are undefeated on the road this year, something nearly impossible to sustain.  Having already defeated the Niners earlier in the season in SF, the Seahawks must beat SF in Seattle to win the division, assuming neither slips up between now and then.  Trap Game?  You bet your ass.  Panthers at home after a shortish week for Seattle?  We have a chance.   We would then be 8-6.

Indianapolis Colts:  At Indy, it looks like a loss.  But the Colts have been below average over the last 4 games.  They barely beat Denver (2-6 at the time) at home (by 2).  They then lost to the mediocre Steelers, beat the lowly Jags (4-7), and lost to the tanking Dolphins (2-9) at home.  Then they lost to the division-leading Texans.  Furthermore, Indy will play at New Orleans at 8:15 on Sunday night.   A possible win?  Certainly.

New Orleans Saints:  Unless the Saints are playing for a playoff bye or home field advantage, this will be another regular season-ending scrimmage game for them.  They beat the Seahawks earlier this year and play the Niners week 15.  It is possible they will have a reason to play, but they could be eliminated from a bye or home field by week 17.  If so, it could be the Kyle Allen show all over again.  In Charlotte, the Panthers could end the season with 10 wins.

Frankly, the Bird teams are the biggest threats to the Panthers struggling into a 10-6 finish. 

PLAYOFFS?  DID YOU SAY PLAYOFFS?

  • The Seahawks or Niners will lock down the top wild card spot.
  • The Vikings and Packers are both 8-3.
  • Vikings remaining schedule: Seahawks, Lions, Chargers, Packers, Bears.  They win 2 or 3 (Lions, Chargers, Bears) to go 10-6 or 11-5
  • Packers remaining schedule: Giants, Redskins, Bears, Vikings, Lions--They win 3-4 of those to go 11-5 or 12-4.

So it looks as if we are in competition with the Vikings if we run the table.   The Rams (6-5) could be in the mix, but they play SF, Seattle, Dallas, and the Cardinals twice.  I see 3 wins there, with 4 a long shot.

Yes, I know--it is a very long shot, but it is also not as daunting as it seems.  Beat the Falcons and the Seahawks and hope New  Orleans has nothing to play for.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cookinbrak said:

1. Beat Washington

2. Lose out after that

3.

4. Profit.

This was not a prediction--simply illustrating the path to a 10-6 season and possible playoff berth.  So slow clap for this insight, even though I asked that you suspend it.

Frankly, I am hoping that RR gets canned and this thing gets re-designed.  It is, however, just like RR to start a win streak after basically being eliminated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully expect to win the next two games. A small playoff hope will continue until we play Seattle. We’ll proceed to lose a nail bitter to Seattle ending our playoff chances. We’ll fall to the Colts in Indy and close out with a W against a Saints team that has nothing to play for.

8-8
 

Typical Panther fashion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...