Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are you willing to wait five years for this team to be competitive again?


TN05

Are you willing to wait five years for this team to be competitive again?  

84 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you willing to wait five years for this team to be competitive again?

    • Yes
      35
    • No
      49


Recommended Posts

It really shouldn't.  A team can go from rags to riches with 1 or 2 good to great drafts in a three year window, and since players at the NFL level usually flash their all-pro or probowl potential before their rookie deals are up, if you are uncompetitive after 5 years it means you very likely have busted in the draft and aren't building towards anything anyways, even if you wait 10 years.

We and Denver picked top two in 2011 and were contending three seasons later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MVPccaffrey said:

It really shouldn't.  A team can go from rags to riches with 1 or 2 good to great drafts in a three year window, and since players at the NFL level usually flash their all-pro or probowl potential before their rookie deals are up, if you are uncompetitive after 5 years it means you very likely have busted in the draft and aren't building towards anything anyways, even if you wait 10 years.

We and Denver picked top two in 2011 and were contending three seasons later. 

This is my concern. We were competitive from 1-15 in two years and from 2-14 in three, and the in-between years weren't awful, but rather mediocre 6-10 and 7-9 seasons. The idea of waiting five seasons to even field a respectable product with the roster we have right now worries me. This should not even be a possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the alternative is more of the same, count me in for five years worth of misery.  We were last competitive the first half of last year, then things blew up, and we are 6-14 since.

Heck, I was married to my ex for four years, and I can't imagine anything that can happen to a football team, short of a plane crash, can match that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TN05 said:

This is my concern. We were competitive from 1-15 in two years and from 2-14 in three, and the in-between years weren't awful, but rather mediocre 6-10 and 7-9 seasons. The idea of waiting five seasons to even field a respectable product with the roster we have right now worries me. This should not even be a possibility.

That's how it works in the NFL due to how pro-ready guys are.  This isn't the NBA where players can take up to 7 years to reach the start of your primes.  I can't think of a scenario where a team linearly got slowly better with the same group of guys for 5+ years and suddenly started contending with them.  The dream is a 2011-2012 Seattle type of draft, or the 2016-2017 Saints draft to a lesser extent.  Cause you only need a handful of probowl and/or all-pro caliber players on rookie contracts to start contending.

 

If we're not contending in 5 years, then the front office and staff being put into place to start next season won't be here when we are contending next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at some of the more recent rebuilds in the league, it looks like it is about a three year process.  And some of those teams (San Francisco the most recent) come out of that really good.  Baltimore quietly rebuilt in about the same time. 

Of course, Cleveland is still in the middle of a 15 year rebuilt, but they are a special case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...