Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The chicken or the egg?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

So let's assume for a moment that we're starting a full on rebuild next year.

The general belief is that such a rebuild starts by getting your chosen quarterback. "But hang on," some folks interject, "What good is a quarterback if we can't protect him? He'd get slaughtered behind our line."

I've seen some pretty strong opinions both ways, so here's a chance for advocates on either side to make their case.

Do you start by drafting a quarterback next year or do you build up an offensive line and get a placeholder with an eye toward getting that franchise QB when you know you can protect him?

Show your math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All depends on Cam and if the QB you want is in this draft. If Cam is back and you’re putting all hopes on him you draft olineman. If cam isn’t back your QB is there you take him and then olineman but just be sure it’s the QB you want. I don’t think we should draft a QB if we’re betting on cam, which I’ve changed my mind about. Next draft is better.

If Cam is gone and the QB you want is NOT in this draft I say full on tank mode. Bring Clausen on a 1 year back to work some magic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Herbert or Tua are there then you pull the trigger, then 2nd and onward you rebuild the o-line as much as you can. What you can't fix in the draft you look to FA. If after all that the o-line doesn't perform well enough, then so be it. Fix the o-line the following off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, onmyown said:

All depends on Cam and if the QB you want is in this draft. If Cam is back and you’re putting all hopes on him you draft olineman. If cam isn’t back your QB is there you take him and then olineman but just be sure it’s the QB you want. I don’t think we should draft a QB if we’re betting on cam, which I’ve changed my mind about. Next draft is better.

If Cam is gone and the QB you want is NOT in this draft I say full on tank mode. Bring Clausen on a 1 year back to work some magic.

Assuming the rebuild means no Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need the protection and the weapons.  Heck, I would suggest a good defense so that you are not asking the QB to do too much playing from behind.

If this were NASCAR, is the driver more important than the car?

How many early first round draft picks fail?  Why?  They go to teams that suck.  How many bad teams have great OLs?  I cannot think of any. 

The QB is flower in the pot, while the OL is the soil, water, and sunlight.  

Dak Prescott--that OL is great.  Russell Wilson?  He had a good OL, great defense, and Beastmode.  When Minnesota had bad OLs, they had bad QB play with Bridgewater. Now they have a good OL, and Cousins is going to the Pro Bowl. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Assuming the rebuild means no Newton.

If Newton is out of the picture it simply depends on who is there in the draft. I would rather pick olineman and tank and pick a QB next year than pick a QB just to pick a QB. If the right franchise guy isn’t there but a home run LT is than you take the LT. 

But I think this year we will be in a position to take a top QB. Even if that means trade up a couple spots, and if the FO feels that franchise QB is in this draft I don’t mind doing what it takes to get him (trading picks).

In free agency I would be willing to spend big on proven olineman but as far as QB, that needs to come from the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this is under the assumption that Grier is as advertised, which is a developmental back up caliber player.

The answer is QB if you have any doubt in regards to Newton. I have no idea how likely Newton bounces back health-wise, but he's almost definitely not going to play on a one year deal, so that will also factor in. If you're comfortable in Newton's health and ok with an extension, it gets easier and you edge a little closer to being able to go BPA with leanings towards OT and DT (and OG if we drop back a ways to trade picks or whatever) and you're able to punt on the QB issue for a couple more years. McShay will weep tears of blood and give us a D.

I mean, look at this poo: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/all/quarterback/

If you cross off the never-gonna-happens off the list, that's pretty laughable. No one is going to bother to come to games with us trotting out Keenum (especially after us rolling with the diet version all season) or Mariota or giving the corpse of Rivers free money for his retirement fund. The only real possible high reward there is Bridgewater, and if my stupid ass knows that, you can bet the actual teams will as well. Teddy is going to either make bank or he's gonna gamble on being the guy in NO in short order and stay put. He also really scary to invest a ton of money into.

Football is a product and you are not going to sell poo by investing your top ten pick on the line then trotting out nothing at QB and trying to do to CMC what the last group of assholes already did to Newton. There is zero excitement regarding Carolina players or football at present. Zilch. The only reason we're even a blip is because of the coaching drama. The owner, with the assumption that he's not a complete and utter moron, isn't going to let that continue into next season. At least in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, pantherj said:

You NEVER pass on a needed potential franchise QB to draft a LT. That would be a critical mistake, and that level of mistake means extra seasons of losing. We're in a "no major mistakes or we're fuged for years" situation.

If you're a GM and you spend a top 10 pick on Herbert you're as good as fired in a couple of years anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you can always talk good or bad in just about everything. 8 wins and leading poo mountain, this rookie class is a big reason. Think about no Tmac or Dan Morgan didn't make that trade to gain a future 2nd rounder. So after Pat Jones breaks his back, DJ " who's not on any roster or PS" Johnson would be starting. Gods knows how bad they already are- 32nd in sacks/pressure/PDs etc... Sure Prince, Trevor, Cam, and little Jimmy haven't done too much, but they are still here.  Honestly its not smart or wise to judge rookies, *unless pro-bowl or cut. Lets revisit this next year, there are slump sophomore years and the biggest jump in players careers most times happens in the 2nd full off-season. You see who wants to be NFL pro and who's happy with teppers checks. I know many of them will be getting surgeries, got to see how they attack that as well....Tmac is playing hurt currently, if they were out of the race, he would be IR'd and maybe half the rookie class as well....I thought Cam was headed for the IR. 
    • It actually looks pretty solid.  A few players to re-sign and three primary positions to upgrade (starters).  Beyond that, we don't have a bunch of holes or need to overpay free agents. this is how I see it (using OTC for the 2026 roster information) on December 22, 2025.  This is rather basic, focusing on the core needs. Blue: Potential players to re-sign in the offseason.  Green: Players under contract for the 2026 season.  Italics: Possible cap casualties Analysis   Offense:  Center:  First, sign Mays for the long term (He is 26–I’d give him a 3-4 year deal).  He is not great, but he is decent and we need consistency on the OL. He does not make stupid mistakes. While the draft is not great in the interior offensive line, signing a veteran who can backup G and C would be a strategy.   Guard:  Canalas seemed to be impressed with Curhan, as I was.  He will be 28 next year, so he has a few years in him. I think he comes cheap and is quality depth.  He can play center, but is perhaps best at G and T.  Valuable reserve.   Tackle:  While Nijman returns as the swing T behind Moton and Ekwonu, the Panthers need to start developing a RT to play behind Moton.  A late-round draft pick that is rough but has all the tools is ideal. As the fourth OT, he can develop behind some pretty good veterans.   Wide Receiver:  We need a playmaker to play opposite TMac.  I believe in Coker, but think he is the AT-type slot. He needs to be re-signed. XL cannot be counted on to step into that role.  He is not that familiar with the WR position and he does not seem to be a student of the game.  This is a strong WR draft. First or second round.   Tight End:  I dunno.  I can see us upgrading the position, but Tremble does a lot of stuff well aside from catching the ball.  Evans is a decent all-around TE, and Sanders has some upside.  I’d love a weapon, but add the WR.   Running Back:  If Dowdle wants to be here, how do you let him walk?  He will be 28, and most RBs hit the wall then.  He deserves a big contract, but 28-year old RBs on big deals don’t earn them.  Go with Hubbard, Brooks, and Etienne.  Build the OL and the backs get better.   Quarterback:  Well, Bryce is improving and his confidence is growing.  Look at how many other QBs have taken time to get it. He is going to be the QB, regardless.  I want a young QB behind him, not the Red Senior Citizen.     Overview: Free Agent Priorities are to re-sign Mays and Coker.  I have Dowdle in blue, but I would let him walk (for reasons provided).  Cuhran played well and is versatile and should be signed if possible.  Draft a developmental OT, a raw, late-round OT.  In the draft, take a WR in rounds 1 or 2.  The offense is in tact–little needs to be done.  Let the OL develop chemistry, sign Mays while he is entering his prime, and get a weapon opposite TMac.  Give Coker a long-term deal.    Defense: ILB;  With only Wallace on the 2026 payroll, this position needs to be addressed.  Rozeboom might be able to be re-signed. I think ILB will be addressed in free agency and the draft. ILB will be the second or third round pick.  We will re-sign Rozeboom and maybe Cherulus and another priority free agent.   Edge/OLB: Scourton seems to be the real deal, but Princely (needs to develop) and Jones II are role players.  The draft is LOADED at the edge rush position.  I expect a first or second round edge player to be taken.   Defensive Tackle:  We have some big salaries at DT, and with Brown on the field, you dont need stars beside him.  I think the team cuts Robinson to get $8.5m in cap room, especially since C Jackson seems to be ready.     Cornerback:  Morgan has done a tremendous job finding talent in the bargain bins at CB.  Smith-Wade has been very solid.  Thornton seems to be a find.  Mike Jackson is a solid pro.     Safety:  Ransom seems to be the heir apparent for the Scott job, and Moehrig gives them a very aggressive, violent pair of safeties.  I like the safeties in this draft, fwiw.  I expect a late round pick.   Overview:  The Panthers must address ILB and Edge as priorities.  The ILB could be a free agent, Rozeboom re-signing, and maybe a draft pick. However, they need a pass rush more than anything else.   This is a great draft for edge players; I would not be surprised to see Dan Morgan double dip at edge.  Depth at S.   As soon as the season is over, look for Morgan to re-sign Mays, Coker, Cuhran, and possibly Rozeboom and Dowdle.  That would lock up the starting C, #3/slot WR, versatile depth on the OL, and get your leading tackler back at ILB.  Three HUGE moves that sould not break the bank.   Free agency would be focused on adding an ILB and a Safety who can play FS in three-S or big nickel sets. The draft would target Edge, WR, and ILB on days 1 and 2. Day 3:  OT depth, S depth, ILB depth.  
    • Seattle is coming across country to our house which will be packed.  We can beat this damn team.  Agree @TheBigKat the team has improved tremendously from last season
×
×
  • Create New...