Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vegas thinks there's a decent chance that Tom Brady is our QB next year


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Favored to stay in New England, but here are the odds for him playing for someone else:

Cleveland: 11/2

Carolina: 6/1

Las Vegas: 6/1

Dallas: 7/1

Indianapolis: 7/1

Chargers: 7/1

Tampa Bay: 9/1

Very interesting. Apparently SOMEONE out there is betting a fair amount of money this will happen or else the odds wouldn't be that relatively high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Remind me why people are opposed to having Tom Brady throw to Christian McCaffrey again? This is assuming Cam no longer wants to play here. The better option would be...?

Exactly what I'm thinking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Remind me why people are opposed to having Tom Brady throw to Christian McCaffrey again? This is assuming Cam no longer wants to play here. The better option would be...?

Im not sure, but straight up, I would be rooting for Brady as hard as I possibly can if he happens to be our starting QB next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady took pay cuts for rings in NE.  He is not loyal to McD.  He stays in NE --- they will offer him a 2-3 year deal and he will take it or retire.

It never bodes well for a QB to go elsewhere at the end of the career, especially after they should retire. 

This does suggest that Vegas thinks Cleveland is the front runner for MxDaniels, however, because this betting line is based on the Brady/McD connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know Brady is a douche but we currently have 2 terrible young QBs on our roster and one that is a star when healthy but that is up in the air. somebody please tell me how having the greatest QB ever would be a bad thing? especially one that gets the ball out quickly which neutralizes having a weak OLine and also allows playmakers to get out in space, which we have 3 really good ones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...