Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can anyone dispute this


therealmjl

Recommended Posts

how many threads are you going to post this in? Lol

Sure, I can dispute it.  Dude took a bunch of mediocre college players to the Sugar Bowl and played a competitive game.  He is clearly a good coach.  His success in college was not built on crazy recruiting, it was built on motivation, play calling, and matchups.  He wasn't perfect, but he was good.

How much he is getting paid is not relevant.  Tepper's pocket books are deep enough that it doesn't matter.  This is who Tepper wanted - that is what matters.  How highly paid he is - not relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you're looking for a coach who has never blown a lead or had bad things to point out then good luck. the Patriots blew a 21 point lead to the Bills a few years ago if i remember right.

the fact remains that he's taken multiple bottom of the barrels teams and turned them into winners.

his success will largely depend on coordinators tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mjligon said:

there are some facts in there including the awful loss in the bowl game against georgia's scrubs and that OU game dispute that.

awful loss in the bowl game?  did you watch the game?  It wasn't awful... they had a chance... but they were clearly outclassed.

that was not Georgia's scrubs lol what.  They didn't have a couple OL in there, sure, but Fromm certainly was playing well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mjligon said:

there are some facts in there including the awful loss in the bowl game against georgia's scrubs and that OU game dispute that.

Barstool is low hanging fruit, disguised neoconservative content as mocking sexual assaults, degrading women, and glorifying garbage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...