Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In the last 30 years only three QBs picked number one overall have won a SB. Stop this Burrow talk.


PanthersNC1984

Recommended Posts

Just now, rayzor said:

What I'm seeing too. Hard to stop. We just have to hit them when they show up. Got a few of us watching so they we'll keep swatting.

yeah it's literally 1 or 2 button clicks to flag as spammer and delete a history, it takes way longer to register a new account than to ban it so that makes it actually kinda fun to watch them wasting their night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rodeo said:

yeah it's literally 1 or 2 button clicks to flag as spammer and delete a history, it takes way longer to register a new account than to ban it so that makes it actually kinda fun to watch them wasting their night.

Glad you guys are on it. I guess he didn't like that I defended cam. He has posted a pic of a dildo to my profile five times already haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PanthersNC1984 said:

Initially I was on the trade for Burrow train, but upon further review, Cincy can have him. I went back and did some research and guess what. Three yes ONLY three QBs that were picked number 1 overall in the last thirty years have gone on and won a SB. Eli and Peyton Manning and Drew Bledsoe. That’s it! Guess what?! I know this will blow your mind but you can win with a QB picked after the first overall pick and still have great success. OMG, like what a revelation guys! Rodgers, Lamar Jackson, Brees, Mahomes, Nick Foles for god sakes.. the list goes on and on, you can have a great QB that isn’t picked number one overall. 

This is a poor analysis. If your gonna say only 3 of those guys have won the super bowl over the last 30 years you have to also somehow how many number 1 picks made it to the super bowl and lost, made the playoffs. Then to give context show the same numbers for the number 2 pick, and on down. So are you saying a quarterback picked 17th has better odds at winning a super bowl thannumebr 1?

The situation your trying to present holds no weight on if a player wins the super bowl or not seeing as a million different other factors go into super bowls,teams around them Injuries and your odds every year are what 1 out of 32. Stop this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bull123 said:

Von Miller, julio Jones, jj watt, cam Jordan, and Patrick Peterson all went after cam 

wouldn’t say he was far and away the best at #1

For who we were and what we needed he absolutely was. Alternative was Clausen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bull123 said:

Ok...good point

I mean for QB aside from Cam that was a horrible year. Yo Gabba Gabba was the other choice in the draft and we were talking about going out and getting a dinosaur like Billy Volek in FA. 

We were rebuilding. Cam just made too much sense at #1 above all the other choices.

We're in a pretty crappy situation right now as far as key personnel goes, but I'm trusting the incoming coaching staff to do a lot more with less.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone might as well give it up now.

just being objective here but if I were the new coach and GM of the Bengals and I traded out of the first pick for Cam Newton— Cam had better look like MVP Cam for the foreseeable future and Burrows had better be Johnny Football part 2. 
 

For the panthers to make that trade, they would have to.
 

A— convince Cam Newton not to retire if we trade him to a worst team than ours.

B— we would have to convince Cinci that Cam looks like MVP Cam even if he doesn’t.

C— we have to convince Cinci that we think it’s ok to trade MVP Cam to them, jee like why wouldn’t we want him?

D— they probably would want Cam, and more picks if all the above is true.

E—buy the ownership of Cinci a whole lot of Ruffies so they can be convinced and wake up afterwards not believing they actually did it.

F— we are crazy— why wouldn’t they want Burrows?

its not happening folks.

Drop it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

There is no way in hell we are going to get Burrow.  Period.

I tend to agree with this. Plus, it would take a king’s ransom and we have too many needs right now. If we’re moving from Cam, I’d rather take a flyer on a guy like Bridgewater, who has experience in a like system, and rebuild the lines. If we have the opportunity to take an Eason or Love later in the draft, fine, take them and sit them. I really believe we’re in a multi-year process now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is a classic case of cherry picking stats to fit your narrative, also, the exact reason casinos have a history board on the roulette wheel. the careers of every other player ever drafted are independent from the career of burrow, or whoever is drafted #1. this statistic is completely useless when predicting the career of any player, inclining burrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...