Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Rhule Effect


ForJimmy

Recommended Posts

I keep hearing that Rhule is great at motivating and getting the most out of his players. Whether that trait will carry over to the NFL is still questionable. If it does carry over there are a couple of players he may really rejuvenate. The obvious one is Jackson. He has talent and looked like the real deal his rookie year, but dropped off last year and it all seems to be mental. I feel Rhule is going to turn him back into a solid CB (maybe NB depending on our depth). The other player I’m curious about is Greg Little. I know he had concussion issues last year, but when he was playing late in the season he looked less stellar than his first couple starts. As far as athletic ability and physical traits, Little looks the part of a solid NFL LT. If Rhule can coach/motivate this guy our offensive line is going to be so much better with Daley being depth or challenging our LG (hopefully we draft or sign one). 
 

Anyone else have any players that Rhule might be able rejuvenate their careers? I know Little was just a rookie, but a lot of us were already writing him off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once they stoped protecting him through playcalling Little looked bad. 2 concusions and IRed for a high ankle sprain. Looks like a long shot and his arrow is deffinatly red and pointing down. Best thing i can say at this point is that at least the new OC can probibly sheme around his awefulness.

I'm hoping Jackson is a player that can make a 180°. Attitude and playing technique are exactly where he could improve his game and his paycheck. He just has to buy in and give this new regime his effort. They sound tailored to turning his funk around.

Other players that could go from maybe to very good that I would love to see are Moton, Armah, Thomas, Burns and the whole other pack of young DE/Edge/4-3 LB guys. I would love better play from any of the older guys but these young guys on their rookie contracts are the future and need development.

Edit: Doh. Add Moore and Samuels to the list. Moore has produced but is still young. My goodness he could hit that next tear with good coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Once they stoped protecting him through playcalling Little looked bad. 2 concusions and IRed for a high ankle sprain. Looks like a long shot and his arrow is deffinatly red and pointing down. Best thing i can say at this point is that at least the new OC can probibly sheme around his awefulness.

I'm hoping Jackson is a player that can make a 180°. Attitude and playing technique are exactly where he could improve his game and his paycheck. He just has to buy in and give this new regime his effort. They sound tailored to turning his funk around.

Other players that could go from maybe to very good that I would love to see are Moton, Armah, Thomas, Burns and the whole other pack of young DE/Edge/4-3 LB guys. I would love better play from any of the older guys but these young guys on their rookie contracts are the future and need development.

Thomas is a good call. He seems to have all the tools to thrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, GRWatcher said:

Yet he's at the Probowl. And you know he did not get there by fan popularity vote. Go figure.

Maybe, but even the players, coaches, and fans have all demonstrated a bad habit at times of voting on past reputation. I watched the games this year and Turner making the Pro Bowl makes me question whether anybody voting for him did. If your line gives up 58 sacks and only moves the ball on the ground halfway decently with CMC carrying the rock, nobody on it should be going to Hawaii.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Maybe, but even the players, coaches, and fans have all demonstrated a bad habit at times of voting on past reputation. I watched the games this year and Turner making the Pro Bowl makes me question whether anybody voting for him did. If your line gives up 58 sacks and only moves the ball on the ground halfway decently with CMC carrying the rock, nobody on it should be going to Hawaii.



Think we're forgetting that the guard/center relationship is big. Paradis is a much bigger issue, I think. Turner looked fine with Kalil. Then you factor in our tackle situation being up and down, we have potential communication errors across the board. Center-to-guard being wrong leads to guard-to-tackle being wrong. Tackle being bad leads to guards being worse than they'd otherwise look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turner has only been OK since he got his contract. I think he is underwhelming but OK is better than the holes we have. He better turn it around or he will be a canidate to be a cap casualty if we are able to plug some holes this year. There are hungry OGs in the 2nd through 4th rounds that could give OK a run for that money. I hope he does but he needs to bring his A game this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, lightsout said:



Think we're forgetting that the guard/center relationship is big. Paradis is a much bigger issue, I think. Turner looked fine with Kalil. Then you factor in our tackle situation being up and down, we have potential communication errors across the board. Center-to-guard being wrong leads to guard-to-tackle being wrong. Tackle being bad leads to guards being worse than they'd otherwise look.

This whole guard/center relationship thing is one where I just have defer to others for lack of any in depth experience or understanding. All I know is that nobody on that line looked good this year. The rookies had flashes and Moton looked like he was at least holding it together for the most part. I hope the new staff can fix it, and if they can do so without mostly having to acquire new players I would be all for it.

The rub is that I’m skeptical of risking any qb’s health or development on that sort of gamble as opposed to giving clear priority to upgrading personnel. I’m willing to give Turner some benefit of the doubt based on past performance and not having the luxury of fixing everything at once.

 But anybody who tries to tell me it’s worth just hoping new coaches can make the same line magically play tons better is gonna get a big ole plate of steaming hot skepticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...