Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Capologist report


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

About $36.8 million in cap room.

 

Roughly $26.6 million in dead cap assuming Olsen gets cut.

That number is correct however it may not be depending on what they want to do with some of the dead cap space.  You could spread Luke's dead cap number over 2 years which means he only cost 4 million this year and 7 million in 2021.  Poe is in a option year, which has a 13 million cap hit.  It is a team not a player option so if they don't pick it up, and why would they, that is another 10 million for 2020.  So without cutting anyone and just rearranging some money that number could be 53 million in cap room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bababoey said:

That number is correct however it may not be depending on what they want to do with some of the dead cap space.  You could spread Luke's dead cap number over 2 years which means he only cost 4 million this year and 7 million in 2021.  Poe is in a option year, which has a 13 million cap hit.  It is a team not a player option so if they don't pick it up, and why would they, that is another 10 million for 2020.  So without cutting anyone and just rearranging some money that number could be 53 million in cap room.

Plus another 19ish if cam is cut/traded?

 

Question is what do you do with all that space?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Going back to the F/A thread from a few days ago there really isnt a whole lot of names on there that blow you away.  Certainly no line help.  Will be interesting to see how we manage our cap with this new dude.  Maybe we save it all for next year.

 

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-the-50-best-available-nfl-free-agents-in-2020

Don't quote me on this, but there were some rumblings that teams might have to spend money they have this year and won't be able to carry over funds because of the CBA expiring after the season and the threat of a lockout. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...