Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen release wasn't mutual


bigpoppa

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Why do we always have drama when people leave? Clearly we don't have the right people handling those situations

We tried to be nice and make it seem mutual but Olsen is the one bringing it up. I love Greg but the last time he complained he got what he wanted but this isn’t Jerry Richardson’s team anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

We tried to be nice and make it seem mutual but Olsen is the one bringing it up. I love Greg but the last time he complained he got what he wanted but this isn’t Jerry Richardson’s team anymore.

Olsen is the main reason we have Hurney. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Also Greg's own words... 

 

What I heard from Greg before this was that he didn't want to be a part of a rebuilding team.  What I heard from Rhule is that he wanted staff and players who bought into the process.

I think some of Greg's comments on FNZ may involve a little revisionist history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, PantherCam213 said:

What I heard from Greg before this was that he didn't want to be a part of a rebuilding team.  What I heard from Rhule is that he wanted staff and players who bought into the process.

I think some of Greg's comments on FNZ may involve a little revisionist history.

I've heard the whole "rebuild" thing a couple of times, but I can't remember if I've heard Olsen himself actually say it.

That's one of the hard parts about following the NFL, honestly. It's often difficult to determine who's telling the truth from who's doing PR from who's doing damage control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
    • Kinda depends how you look at it both were 3rd round draft pics.  Nico was nothing before stroud and tank came in with stroud.  If both were on the panthers would young have them doing well and starting or would their stats be low.  I really dont know the answer to that.  None of the panthers wrs have left and did well either but personally i feel neither of nico or tank would do much on the panthers.  
×
×
  • Create New...