Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fake Matt Stafford Rumor


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

That’s interesting that he’s the one reporting it.

I’m a Detroiter, Bernie isn’t a beat writer and I wouldn’t even consider him a “reporter” either, he’s just one of the local channel’s main sorts anchor on the news.

Just a weird person to hear that kind of rumor from

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Lmfao, when the Detriot Lions have more common sense and decency than the Carolina Panthers. :crying:

They came out and flat out said the rumor was false. 

That's what you do when you aren't potentially shopping your franchise QB. 

When you are, you say stuff like "We'll see when he's healthy".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cracka McNasty said:

They came out and flat out said the rumor was false. 

That's what you do when you aren't potentially shopping your franchise QB. 

When you are, you say stuff like "We'll see when he's healthy".

If we're actively shopping a franchise quarterback then there shouldn't be any other player on the roster above consideration in moving for assets to acquire the next quarterback. That's the true "it's just business baby" model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

If we're actively shopping a franchise quarterback then there shouldn't be any other player on the roster above consideration in moving for assets to acquire the next quarterback. That's the true "it's just business baby" model.

If someone is willing to give us a king's ransom for anyone on our team, I wouldn't turn it down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

If we're actively shopping a franchise quarterback then there shouldn't be any other player on the roster above consideration in moving for assets to acquire the next quarterback. That's the true "it's just business baby" model.

SMH, you just can’t get your head wrapped around losing Cam. There’s been threads in here about 5 year plan discussions. CMC and Moore are weapons that 100% fit in a 5 year plan. You’re mixing up it’s just business with hey let’s make stupid decisions. Giving up CMC and Moore (I include him because it’s literally the same argument and he’s not white) is opposite of the they don’t fit the 5 year plan. Cam at $35M a year, hoping he’s healthy may not fit the 5 year plan. Get it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, stbugs said:

SMH, you just can’t get your head wrapped around losing Cam. There’s been threads in here about 5 year plan discussions. CMC and Moore are weapons that 100% fit in a 5 year plan. You’re mixing up it’s just business with hey let’s make stupid decisions. Giving up CMC and Moore (I include him because it’s literally the same argument and he’s not white) is opposite of the they don’t fit the 5 year plan. Cam at $35M a year, hoping he’s healthy may not fit the 5 year plan. Get it?

In a 5 year plan one does not simply wait till the 5th year for improvement. And I agree CMC & Moore are part of that plan. But we have to realize that, in that 5th year, CMC will be in his 7th season and Moore will be in his 6th. Without catastrophic changes such as injuries and CBA changes we will be having this same Cam-type discussion over those two in 4 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
    • Kinda depends how you look at it both were 3rd round draft pics.  Nico was nothing before stroud and tank came in with stroud.  If both were on the panthers would young have them doing well and starting or would their stats be low.  I really dont know the answer to that.  None of the panthers wrs have left and did well either but personally i feel neither of nico or tank would do much on the panthers.  
×
×
  • Create New...