Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SI.com trade scenario


jfra78

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, chknwing said:

2 firsts for the next 2 years. Yes please.

It's so hypothetical it's not funny. Not sure why Detroit would want 7 that bad when they have 3 and want to trade down. That said, Detroit is likely mediocre and this would really help to secure Lawrence, Fields or Howell, whoever you want as the future. Again, this trade would definitely mean trading Cam and if that's the case, I could see this being a decent trade. It's a risk and I'd probably ask for the 2021 2nd or something more in 2022. That said, Detroit has picked 8 and 3 the last two years and they don't appear to be getting any better. Anyway, it's a made up scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jfra78 said:

https://www.si.com/.amp-lions/nfl/lions/news/lions-land-chase-young-and-isaiah-simmons-in-blockbuster-mock-draft

In this scenario Carolina trades its 2020 1st for Detroits 2021, 2022 1st and 2021 3rd. Is this something you can see happening?  Personally I'd rather get brown at 7 or trade back, but would like to stay in the top half of the 1st.

Trade is dumb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We won't trade a thing until we see who is drafted in the six spots ahead of us. So many great prospects at positions of need, there'd be no chance we'd pass up on catching a steal if someone dropped through the cracks because of a run on QBs and WRs. 

Now, after those first six picks are there, we might look at the board and say we're open for business if somehow the best DT, Edge, LB and OT were already snatched up, but something tells me that we will see one of those that is supposed to go early still sitting there available at 7.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Terrible trade for us and it just feeds into the tanking rhetoric. Fail right off the bat from the conceptual stage. 

I agree, it really just seems like the media really thinks we are tanking hard.  I just don't see it personally

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...