Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

70% of the U.S. economy is consumer spending. Unemployment is probably going to hit 30%. You can't snap your fingers out of that either.

In the short term, yes you can.  And the reason why you can snap your fingers and make it happen, is because we snapped our fingers and made it this way.  Its much, much tougher to recover when we get into a natural recession.  The longer we stay in this man made recession, the closer we get to rolling into a natural recession.  Now THAT is what you can't snap your fingers and reverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

In the short term, yes you can.  And the reason why you can snap your fingers and make it happen, is because we snapped our fingers and made it this way.  Its much, much tougher to recover when we get into a natural recession.  The longer we stay in this man made recession, the closer we get to rolling into a natural recession.  Now THAT is what you can't snap your fingers and reverse.

Unemployment always takes the elevator down and the stairs back up. Unemployment numbers are already massive. 70% of the economy is consumer spending. That spending (and those jobs) aren't coming back immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Unemployment always takes the elevator down and the stairs back up. Unemployment numbers are already massive. 70% of the economy is consumer spending. That spending (and those jobs) aren't coming back immediately.

The longer we stay in lockdown, the more we get into a natural recession and the more I agree with you.  But in the short term, yes, many jobs will come back the minute the lockdowns end.  

Think about it like this.  If every government said every restaurant and bar could open tomorrow, do you think there would be a normal slow trickle of bars and restaurants opening up, consumers very slowly going back to restaurants and bars over the course of the next couple years, and then a very slow hiring of restaurant and bar personnel over the next few years?  Because that's not what I see.  What I see is a RUSH to bars and restaurants and then tons of social media posts about how too many people were at X, Y or Z place (complete with photos).  And that's the difference that I'm talking about when I'm discussing a man made recession in the short term vs a natural recession over a longer term.

If you open gyms tomorrow, they aren't going to spend the next 5 years trying to build back up clientele.  And that's the difference between people cancelling their memberships by the millions naturally vs forcing them to not go to the gym.  

Edited by Wes21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll have to forgive me for not having a ton of confidence in numbers touted by a guy whose primary "contribution" to healthcare was participating in insulin price fixing to maximize profits. He's already shown he's fully willing to watch people die to make a buck. He should be in a prison cell beside Martin's Shkreli.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You'll have to forgive me for not having a ton of confidence in numbers touted by a guy whose primary "contribution" to healthcare was participating in insulin price fixing to maximize profits. He's already shown he's fully willing to watch people die to make a buck. He should be in a prison cell beside Martin's Shkreli.

 

Numbers are numbers, no matter who touts or ignores.  Now, if the numbers are wrong....

 

Overall curve is definitely trending down

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

Edited by stirs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Wes21 said:

The longer we stay in lockdown, the more we get into a natural recession and the more I agree with you.  But in the short term, yes, many jobs will come back the minute the lockdowns end.  

Think about it like this.  If every government said every restaurant and bar could open tomorrow, do you think there would be a normal slow trickle of bars and restaurants opening up, consumers very slowly going back to restaurants and bars over the course of the next couple years, and then a very slow hiring of restaurant and bar personnel over the next few years?  Because that's not what I see.  What I see is a RUSH to bars and restaurants and then tons of social media posts about how too many people were at X, Y or Z place (complete with photos).  And that's the difference that I'm talking about when I'm discussing a man made recession in the short term vs a natural recession over a longer term.

If you open gyms tomorrow, they aren't going to spend the next 5 years trying to build back up clientele.  And that's the difference between people cancelling their memberships by the millions naturally vs forcing them to not go to the gym.  

They are going to be slowly coming back to restaurants and bars over the next few months. People are already trickling back to restaurants and bars. The amount of people who I've seen order take out is insane during this pandemic. Dude the vaccine will be out in the next 1-2yrs your timeline is wayyy off.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Image

I can't speak for "transit" in this area but the driving metric is close to what I've experienced where I live.  Things aren't quite back to normal but its definitely trending that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone think this could be the second wave we're currently in?  I've read many an article and even know some people directly who believe they may have had it back in December.  

I just find it hard to believe that as much as people freely travel that it wasn't here much earlier.  I suspect in a place like NY, that it was slowly percolating to the point that it got to now, and that took time.

Also, read an article out of the UK yesterday that a former director of WHO said he predicts the virus will actually naturally burn out on its own by the time that the vaccine will be available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Anyone think this could be the second wave we're currently in?  I've read many an article and even know some people directly who believe they may have had it back in December.  

I just find it hard to believe that as much as people freely travel that it wasn't here much earlier.  I suspect in a place like NY, that it was slowly percolating to the point that it got to now, and that took time.

Also, read an article out of the UK yesterday that a former director of WHO said he predicts the virus will actually naturally burn out on it's own by the time that the vaccine will be available.

I am hearing a lot of this, and I hope its true.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...