Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

"For children (0-17 years), cumulative COVID-19 hospitalization rates are much lower than cumulative influenza hospitalization rates at comparable time points* during recent influenza seasons."-CDC

Yeah, it's well known that COVID generally doesn't hit the young all that hard when we know the flu can be pretty dangerous for young children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

"For children (0-17 years), cumulative COVID-19 hospitalization rates are much lower than cumulative influenza hospitalization rates at comparable time points* during recent influenza seasons."-CDC

I understand the statement, but what is your overall premise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I understand the statement, but what is your overall premise?

Should schools be closed this fall to in-person learning?  If everyone masks up on on school grounds, what's the problem?  Colleges could pose some issues due to on campus living, but what's the issue for K-12?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Should schools be closed this fall to in-person learning?  If everyone masks up on on school grounds, what's the problem?  Colleges could pose some issues due to on campus living, but what's the issue for K-12?

That kids are fuging super spreaders of basically any illness. They are little disease bags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Should schools be closed this fall to in-person learning?  If everyone masks up on on school grounds, what's the problem?  Colleges could pose some issues due to on campus living, but what's the issue for K-12?

If you have kids teaching kids, kids running the schools, kids driving the school buses and kids raising themselves when they get home...there's no reason to shut down the schools.

The issue is not the kids, its all of the people they come in contact with.  And maybe school has changed since I was there, but a majority of my teachers could be considered higher risk.

Edited by Wes21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Science still does not have a firm understanding on how much kids can spread Covid. The data is just not there since schools were shut down so fast back in March.


Since we don’t know, Governors and schools are taking a cautious approach. Low risk does not mean no risk.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Should schools be closed this fall to in-person learning?  If everyone masks up on on school grounds, what's the problem?  Colleges could pose some issues due to on campus living, but what's the issue for K-12?

If everyone went potty like they should, we could eliminate diapers. Little kids have a different set of ideas than ( most) adults.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That kids are fuging super spreaders of basically any illness. They are little disease bags.

True, but do we close down schools for the flu?  Does the flu not spread from kids to adults?  Asymptomatic folks are less likely to be a vector than symptomatic persons.  Again, college is a whole different ball of wax, but K-12 should be straight forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tbe said:

Science still does not have a firm understanding on how much kids can spread Covid. The data is just not there since schools were shut down so fast back in March.


Since we don’t know, Governors and schools are taking a cautious approach. Low risk does not mean no risk.

 

Ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I find it funny those who continue to hate on Bryce based on his rookie year when he had zero weapons or offensive line have a problem with those of us projecting his career from the 8-9 games where he played like a top 10 QB and made more big time throws during that period than any other QB.  The stats may bot have been there in terms of yards or TD passes but that’s coming as the roster improves. For those who think physical traits can overcome roster deficiencies we all witnessed how Mahomes looked under pressure that Bryce faced for most of his rookie year, we saw what happened with Stroud in similar circumstances.  None of us were creating posts proclaiming Bryce as the next Brady but we can’t just sit idly while thread after thread is created continuing with the  anti Bryce tropes  instead of supporting him and just letting him continue to develop.     
    • To me Bryce's ceiling is his backup, Andy Dalton, in his prime.  Sure, he may get us some winning seasons and may even get us to the playoffs on occasion, but with an early exit.  To me he doesn't have what it takes to be elite and it takes an elite QB to consistently get deep into the playoffs.  He's not Jackson, he's not Mahomes and he's not even Allen.  In an organization like Philly, he possibly could have what it takes to make a deep run, but let's face it...Philly is well oiled machine and and we are a GMC Grimlin.
    • If he was he would still be in the league.... Cam never learned to play QB without relying on his athletism and rocket arm.   
×
×
  • Create New...